WTC Demolition - WTC1 Smoke #1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
354 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 19, 2009

WTC Demolition - WTC1 Smoke #1

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Probbaly because a 120,000 tonnes building just fell with immense gravity, making the oxygen level drop in under seconds of the area whereby the tower fell, the pressure and shockwave would´ve outcasted the smoke because the concrete came in such a big amount, and with such great speed that the smoke moved, by the force. and it was 11 south, wind @ca, or sq"16 - AM wind, the morning the towers fell so this video has no point. thank you.

  • "Why is the smoke only on one side of the Tower?"

    Because the wind blows it away?

    I have not understood the meaning of this video.

  • I think there was an11mph wind out of the south that day. But what I find even more compelling is the Iron on the right side of the bldg in this video! Even though it looks skinny it's I believe a 16" Sq. box collumn and it's at least 30 stories high!

    X12' it's at least 300 foot tall. Thats 400 square feet to work as a sail! Why does it not BLOW over? Maybe a cutter charge cutting at an angle fired off late?????

  • I think there was an11mph wind out of the south that day. But what I find even more compelling is the Iron on the right side of the bldg in this video! Even though it looks skinny it's I believe a 16" Sq. box collumn and it's at least 30 stories high!

    X12' it's at least 300 foot tall. Thats 400 square feet to work as a sail! Why does it not BLOW over? Maybe a cutter charge cutting at an angle fired off late?????

  • What stands out for me is the actual movement of the smoke from the point of collapse.

    It stays stagnant in the air and then moves UP.

    If there was a ´piledriver´ force surely the smoke would have been sucked down the way?

    Just an observation.

    It´s so f*cking eerie when you see the collapse the way youve done it femr2.

    5 stars for raising the hairs on the back of my neck again (lol)

    Cheers.

  • Umm, i think, the wind was pretty strong, it was blowing ll that massive black smoke from 'fuel' away, away , and away, it was even visible from space as a smoke line. Besides the top fall to the direction of of the wind, that might of pushed the termite dust that way.

  • I guess i didn't answer your questions - i'll give it a go:

    As for "plenty of mass" (ugh) i would expect it to have received around 90% of the mass the left hand side received. This would have been applied to the right side as the right side of the cap fell on it, but slightly delayed when compared to the mass transfer on the left hand side, and as i say, maybe somewhere in the region of 10% less mass being applied. My guess. But the science on this is all skewed if interference took place.

  • If you mean the smoke that was inside the towers at the point of collapse, i think firstly that amount of smoke is miminal compared to the amount of smoke we see on the outside.

    Secondly, the floors with most fire and damage (where the collapse seems at first to occur) - you can see at the point of collapse all the smoke from those floors get pushed out of the towers, immediately to become mixed with dust clouds from the building. It appears to fall to the ground with this debris cloud.

  • Don't get me wrong - i think the collapse was aided (by explosives at various points or something - its not my field of study so i haven't got a detailed theory on the collapse..... yet).

    Something straightened out the collapse of the towers in my estimation.

    But the smoke and dust clouds from the explosion get carried by the wind. Same as all the other dust and smoke in that picture.

    (cont.)

  • Firstly, i don't believe the official theory of events. My youtube channel should be testament to that.

    Secondly, the top of the tower doesn't fall completely off to one side - it is still above most of the tower, leaning slightly to the left from this view point as it falls - so there's plenty of mass falling on that right hand side.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more