Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Reponse to Telemantros (Part 1/4)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
149 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 21, 2009

Luigi and Mario make a four part video response to Telemantros.

Telemantros' video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxffqYGV_bk

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SuperAtheistBrothers)

  • How is the supernatural explanation regarding Jesus and belief in his resurrection spreading more complex than the natural?

    Me thinks the atheists brothers should read up on Gary Habermas.

  • Because natural explanations always outweigh supernatural explanations. If they didn't, why bother utilizing science? Isn't "god-dun-it" an adequate answer to any pondering of the world? What is lightning and where did it come from? God obviously, and that is all there is to it, not so satisfying is it?

  • what's the name of Telemantros' video?

  • In the sidebar, lol.

Top Comments

  • Funny pictures are funny (:

  • typical crap...w/o the bible really there isn't much of an arguement so the battle rages to tell us why it's GOT to be accepted as real evidence.

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • >"Because natural explanations always outweigh supernatural explanations."

    Seems like little more than question begging. Particularly this segment I've quoted. I will, however, allow you to elaborate.

  • It's hard to listen wit the funny pictures, which are funny, but I like how I get an extra life at the end.

  • Supernatural isn't really a well defined term, but the best idea I have of a common trait of supernatural things is that they are either unprovable or not proven by the evidence we have gathered from the natural world.

    The "you'd have to (know you were) omniscient to know it's not happened" uses Decarts level of "know," but we could never know we were omniscient on that level of know.

    Naturalism is lefd to from evidentialist epistimiology, as evidence from senses is all natural.

  • yes the funny pics are very funny

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more