Reponse to Telemantros (Part 1/4)
Uploader Comments (SuperAtheistBrothers)
Top Comments
-
Funny pictures are funny (:
-
typical crap...w/o the bible really there isn't much of an arguement so the battle rages to tell us why it's GOT to be accepted as real evidence.
All Comments (8)
-
>"Because natural explanations always outweigh supernatural explanations."
Seems like little more than question begging. Particularly this segment I've quoted. I will, however, allow you to elaborate.
-
It's hard to listen wit the funny pictures, which are funny, but I like how I get an extra life at the end.
-
Supernatural isn't really a well defined term, but the best idea I have of a common trait of supernatural things is that they are either unprovable or not proven by the evidence we have gathered from the natural world.
The "you'd have to (know you were) omniscient to know it's not happened" uses Decarts level of "know," but we could never know we were omniscient on that level of know.
Naturalism is lefd to from evidentialist epistimiology, as evidence from senses is all natural.
-
yes the funny pics are very funny
How is the supernatural explanation regarding Jesus and belief in his resurrection spreading more complex than the natural?
Me thinks the atheists brothers should read up on Gary Habermas.
hawke123 2 years ago
Because natural explanations always outweigh supernatural explanations. If they didn't, why bother utilizing science? Isn't "god-dun-it" an adequate answer to any pondering of the world? What is lightning and where did it come from? God obviously, and that is all there is to it, not so satisfying is it?
SuperAtheistBrothers 2 years ago
what's the name of Telemantros' video?
migkillertwo 2 years ago
In the sidebar, lol.
SuperAtheistBrothers 2 years ago