Found that history textbook map published by japanes in 1928.
The textbook proof that DokDo is not japanes territory.
It's history textbook map that printed Korean territory and Japanes territory.
Japanes territory was painted by red color. but DokDo and ULungDo was painted by purple color.
Clearly, The history map proof that DokDo is Korean territory.
Clearly,It's printed that history proffessional supervised in DongKyung Empire Universty and published by government designated textbook distributing company
We can see from the Book. Japanes government clearly recognized that DokDo and UlungDo is Korean territory in 1928.
But recently, Japanes are persisting to DokDo is Japanes territory.
what a funny silly talk!!!!!
@TheMangaSan actually we don't need your affection or support for us. we wouldn't care how and where you are gonna die. we would rather be happy if you were gone.
shrimpchocolate 1 month ago
sooncool123
I answer what time of response, and I do it expressly to PM, and do not send it to the past response.(2011/10/30)
(surroundings delay)
Participate in a current active response!
wolfpack13000 1 month ago
@wolfpack13000 getting branwashed by WJF and crappy japan forever
sooncool123 1 month ago in playlist 한국과 일본
@TheMangaSan Why are you being such a heartless bastard? You don't feel bad for the thousands of innocent kids who died during the earthquake? If you don't, then I hope you go to hell, if there is one.
mysterypersonbc 1 month ago
Fuck japs. I wouldnt feel bad if there was another earthquake to fuck them.
TheMangaSan 2 months ago
Youtube↓(title)
竹島問題 ・于山島検証動画part1 / 竹島()
youtube.com /watch?v=kIXP91IJTK0&sns=em
竹島問題 ・于山島検証動画part2
↑titleonly
by yabutarou
wolfpack13000 4 months ago
>3goku
"于山島 is to the north of 鬱陵島, and there is the neighborhood in a Korean ancient documents "「日省録」" with two or three 里", and even a sentence can confirm that it is the "于山島" and 竹嶼 (Chikdo).
wolfpack13000 4 months ago
>3goku
There is not the map which I wrote down a characteristic to understand when I shave current Takeshima (Tok-do) with the map of old documents definitely in Korea.
(as for Takeshima two islands.)
In Li-regimed Korea Era, there is not the activity trace that was active in Takeshima (Tok-do) either.
(in Li-regimed Korea, I set a limit to crossing the sea to 鬱陵島.)
※ Korea applies a claim to Takeshima forcibly.
wolfpack13000 4 months ago
@wolfpack13000
You need to put that map down because you are getting nowhere using current measuring system against ANCIENT HAND DRAWN MAPS. What are you going to do next, superimpose SATELLITE PHOTOS against it?
3goku 4 months ago
>3goku
It is got understanding of the international recognition, and there are not your grounds.
"于山島 is to the north of 鬱陵島, and there is the neighborhood in a Korean ancient documents "ministry of day record" with two or three villages", and even a sentence can confirm that it is 竹嶼(Chikdo) with the "于山島".
wolfpack13000 4 months ago