Dakeshima? No!! it's DokDo.. DokDo is Korean territory

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,307
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 3, 2008

Found that history textbook map published by japanes in 1928.

The textbook proof that DokDo is not japanes territory.

It's history textbook map that printed Korean territory and Japanes territory.

Japanes territory was painted by red color. but DokDo and ULungDo was painted by purple color.

Clearly, The history map proof that DokDo is Korean territory.

Clearly,It's printed that history proffessional supervised in DongKyung Empire Universty and published by government designated textbook distributing company

We can see from the Book. Japanes government clearly recognized that DokDo and UlungDo is Korean territory in 1928.

But recently, Japanes are persisting to DokDo is Japanes territory.
what a funny silly talk!!!!!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 23 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (104)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheMangaSan actually we don't need your affection or support for us. we wouldn't care how and where you are gonna die. we would rather be happy if you were gone.

  • sooncool123

    I answer what time of response, and I do it expressly to PM, and do not send it to the past response.(2011/10/30)

    (surroundings delay)

    Participate in a current active response!

  • @wolfpack13000 getting branwashed by WJF and crappy japan forever

  • @TheMangaSan Why are you being such a heartless bastard? You don't feel bad for the thousands of innocent kids who died during the earthquake? If you don't, then I hope you go to hell, if there is one.

  • Fuck japs. I wouldnt feel bad if there was another earthquake to fuck them.

  • Youtube↓(title)

    竹島問題 ・于山島検証動画part1 / 竹島()

    youtube.com /watch?v=kIXP91IJTK0&sns=em

    竹島問題 ・于山島検証動画part2

    ↑titleonly

    by yabutarou

  • >3goku

    "于山島 is to the north of 鬱陵島, and there is the neighborhood in a Korean ancient documents "「日省録」" with two or three 里", and even a sentence can confirm that it is the "于山島" and 竹嶼 (Chikdo).

  • >3goku

    There is not the map which I wrote down a characteristic to understand when I shave current Takeshima (Tok-do) with the map of old documents definitely in Korea.

    (as for Takeshima two islands.)

    In Li-regimed Korea Era, there is not the activity trace that was active in Takeshima (Tok-do) either.

    (in Li-regimed Korea, I set a limit to crossing the sea to 鬱陵島.)

    ※ Korea applies a claim to Takeshima forcibly.

  • @wolfpack13000

    You need to put that map down because you are getting nowhere using current measuring system against ANCIENT HAND DRAWN MAPS. What are you going to do next, superimpose SATELLITE PHOTOS against it?

  • >3goku

    It is got understanding of the international recognition, and there are not your grounds.

    "于山島 is to the north of 鬱陵島, and there is the neighborhood in a Korean ancient documents "ministry of day record" with two or three villages", and even a sentence can confirm that it is 竹嶼(Chikdo) with the "于山島".

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more