Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Binary Economics with Professor Robert Ashford

Starts with a few minutes of a building that is worth millions and millions of dollars, thus illustrating the material of Robert Ashford B.A., University of South Florida J.D., Harvard University...  
 
Customize

More From: paulagloria

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

6 ratings
Sign in to rate
2,182 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (7)   Options

Loading...
paulagloria (11 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
4:37 is where the show on binary economics starts otherwise this starts off with Dominic Stevens who "hosted" the 9/11 TV Fakery activists (Nico, Al Duffy and Ryan) last year. Not sure about the economy but it is headed towards becoming a fabulous condo building as the location is right by City Hall 12 Warren St
seventy18 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
What about surplus value? No mention of it! Labour produces capital. So the reality of this notion is Economist really shouldn't be talking about economics. This man produces nothing therefore he lives off the avails of the working man (productive masses) what this guy is talking about is live labour apposed to dead labour. One should remember that productivity creates unemployment so this Theory is crap.
Keys to the kingdom what a load of shit.
paulagloria (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
shit is a valuable commodity in many parts of he world
ourearthhome (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
What is natural is for individuals to earn a living by working (labor), using tools (capital). All of this takes place on, in and from land. What is unnatural is individuals "owning" land and charging others for the right of access to their own earth. Labor and capital earn their living; landowners do not because they do not make land and do not create its value. The community creates all land value which is the proper income for community via taxes not taxes on capital and labor.
randall2020 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
This seems too optimistic, and I wonder about the professor who attributes "property is theft" to Marx when it comes from Jean-Pierre Proudhon. Marx was his student at one time.

Proudhon argued for mutualist organization and criticized both capitalism and "dogmatic communism". Another thing, the professor brings up the outmoded idea of "natural law". That applies to biology, not to human social organization.
YouTubReptilian (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Capitalism is the way! Thanks Paula for sharing this wonderful information. You have inspired me to start a new business
paulagloria (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
you miss the point....just starting a new business is like setting up your own website and miss the heavy traffic of YouTube for example...whereas if we had capital ownership in YouTUbe (determined by content and hits and all that, the real media broadcaster would emergy as a function of what the ppl really want....this is not about starting your own business although that is fine too
jackp6 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
I agree Paula.

It's the love for what is, not divided from what is. When you will live your responsibility, you should not be forced by anyone. Money forces people to do things they don't want to. But they have to to survive.

People should have the power to live who they are. Nobody's master and nobody's servant.
jackp6 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
"basic income is a little demeaning."

I don't think so. We just should share the abundance mother Earth is giving us. Everybody has the right to be, to live and creating the world they want to live in. When it depends on the power of capital (enslavement), man can never bring what they want to bring in this world.
paulagloria (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
why should one man own any part of mother nature more than another...I think it is a question of love for mother nature, responsibility to care and appreciate her gifts including our fellow man. then our life is full and we will have passed through not missing anything and settling only for money, power, body guards, secrets and bamboozlement to fool others into believing they are not equally entitled to OWNERSHIP

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.