Kevin James - Get a Load of This Guy!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,466
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 16, 2008

Counterfeit conservative talk show host gets mauled by Chris Matthews and Air America's Mark Green. Ouch!

For more videos, podcasts, and to watch Lionel LIVE visit lionelonline.com

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • This faggot James needs a ridiculously insane ass-beating

  • This Kevin James is another Bill O in the making. I can't believe that idiot still tried to argue his point with Chris after Chris proved him to be an ignorant, arrogant republican A-hole. The saddest thing is that, most republicans would have done the same. If the White working class or anyone votes for McCain, they deserve to be in the condition that they are in.

see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i would rather hear from the king of queens

  • haha great stuff lionel

    If you're in a hole stop digging!

  • I am not Kevin James! But Kevin's point was that talking to a terrorist results in nothing at best and appeasement at worst. Kevin probably went a little far with his freak out, probably to get attention and increase his audience, but he has a point. I agree with you that talking alone does not equal appeasement.

  • falsare: No accident the quote you cite is 45years old. The Liberals of today are nothing like that; they are completely reactionary and opposed to any new ideas.

    They're ideologues, defending the programs of the 60s/70s (affirmative action, abortion on demand, big govt solutions to every issue) bitterly. Their answer to every failed program is "more money will fix it".

    I spent 24 yrs in the federal govt and have seen the waste and incompetence up close. BO will jack taxes and expand govt

  • coliin: I'm not religious and have no tolerance for that segment of the Religious Right that wants to bring religion into the politcal realm. However, I think too many on the Left are openly contemptuous of all religion and all people of religious faith. There are a lot of good people out there that are better citizens for having some modest religious faith.

    And what about political zealots? I'm much more afraid of ideological fanatics (marxists, etc.) than I am of a Huckabee or Romney.

  • It definitely seems like both sides suppress free speech. The left seems more directly concerned with censorship to "protect the children" etc. The right however seems to have more nefarious motives: "Be quiet angry masses"

    That said, contempt for religious people or at least distaste is in the same interest as not electing a schizophrenic as a president. I want rational decisions if laws are going to restrain me, not decisions based on antiquated faith in the paranormal.

  • Obama has just spoken of having diplomatic relations, if you concidor talking and letting other people "absorb" the sound energy of you expressing your views/potentional risks of a conflict (confronted face to face) then your very strange imo.

  • You are arguing with Kevin, not me.  But since you brought it up, appeasement is not limited to giving away land. Giving into hostile demands is appeasement, and Kevin's point was that giving into any of Ahmadinejad's insane demands would be appeasement and that nothing else in terms of a change could result from talking to him.

  • search a dictionary, if Obama had "appeasment ideas", he would have a plan to for instance give Iran half of Afghanistan

    Kevin where refering to a Bush comment about a British primenister who played a huge role in the build up to ww2

    that was the issue being discussed

    It`s quite interesting that conservatives call deomcrats appeasers, concidoring the huge amounts of Military technology and financial support USA gives to the motherland of most of the 9/11 hijackers, Saudi arabia

  • "If by a 'Liberal' they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people — their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties — someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a 'Liberal,' then I'm proud to say I'm a 'Liberal.' // John F Kennedy

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more