You have the same chance of getting your money from him, as you do in getting Anthony Watts to stick to his promise to "support the results" from a study of suspect US temperature stations (the same ones David Evans spreadsheet modeller goes on and on about as being proof of a conspiracy). Even though the study was done by a known climate skeptic (and funded by others), results show the same temp rise with or without the suspect stations. Bye Bye conspiracy theory. Search for mueller 31 march
I have noticed a few things thing with climate skeptics aside being Liberal voters, they have usually spent their whole life in one place, have very narrow minds, little respect for other cultures, tend to be lazy and pessimistic and above all else are very very ignorant.
@YouDontKn0wMe, um, that's your argument? Do you have ANY science to back up your dramatic claim? Please quote climatologists, university studies, international climate organizations and not politicians (Al Gore is not every AGW believer's hero) or popular media source like Faux News, please. And, do you know what 'factorial' means? I don't think you're using it correctly. :-)
So any intelligent person must be wrong because they weren't involved with the organisation who cooked the books? Scientific debate should be on the facts - not the person. Look at the copenhagenclimatechallenge website for over 150 CLIMATE scientists who declare that this is a scam.
2009 - 27 billion tons CO2 dumped in atmosphere. Switzerland sized area rainforest disappears. 2010 - 27 billion tons CO2 dumped in atmosphere. Switzerland sized area rainforest disappears. 2011 - 27 billion tons CO2 dumped in atmosphere. Switzerland sized area rainforest disappears. 2012 - 27 billion tons CO2 dumped in atmosphere. Switzerland sized area rainforest disappears. 2013 - 27 billion tons CO2 dumped in atmosphere. Switzerland sized area... I'll take up yor stupid bet.
You have the same chance of getting your money from him, as you do in getting Anthony Watts to stick to his promise to "support the results" from a study of suspect US temperature stations (the same ones David Evans spreadsheet modeller goes on and on about as being proof of a conspiracy). Even though the study was done by a known climate skeptic (and funded by others), results show the same temp rise with or without the suspect stations. Bye Bye conspiracy theory. Search for mueller 31 march
indulis1 5 months ago
I have noticed a few things thing with climate skeptics aside being Liberal voters, they have usually spent their whole life in one place, have very narrow minds, little respect for other cultures, tend to be lazy and pessimistic and above all else are very very ignorant.
Have a nice day.
headorbinski 7 months ago
LOL. The idiot in this video will lose his money.
AtomSmash3r 7 months ago
Betting against the laws that govern the universe is just..... stupid.
Desertphile 8 months ago
If the rainforest diseappearence will be same the every year in the future, then it can't be caused by Global Warming.
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
@YouDontKn0wMe, um, that's your argument? Do you have ANY science to back up your dramatic claim? Please quote climatologists, university studies, international climate organizations and not politicians (Al Gore is not every AGW believer's hero) or popular media source like Faux News, please. And, do you know what 'factorial' means? I don't think you're using it correctly. :-)
Raksaht 1 year ago
Aww I thought the bet was out for anyone. That's money in the bank.
NK029 1 year ago
Go educate yourself, look at the factorial evidence proving global warming is a scam.
YouDontKn0wMe 2 years ago
So any intelligent person must be wrong because they weren't involved with the organisation who cooked the books? Scientific debate should be on the facts - not the person. Look at the copenhagenclimatechallenge website for over 150 CLIMATE scientists who declare that this is a scam.
AnthK1973 2 years ago
ProphetOfSpoon 2 years ago