Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

No Treason #IV: The Constitution of No Authority (part1)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,089
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 14, 2008

A reading of Lysander Spooner's classic "No Treason #IV: The Constitution of No Authority". Reading by Marc Stevens

Marc Stevens website:
http://www.adventuresinlegalland.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Harpakhrad11)

  • "The LAW doesn't end because the founders have died"

    The LAW was never legit.

    "anymore than the laws against murder, theft, rape and arson are void."

    Unlike the Constitution, these things are constants of history.

    "You still will go to prison!"

    For what? Posting a video? Your the NWO scum here.

  • What good is all this nonsense without real property. The "People" have all of it in alludial title everyone else has deeds and pay real estate taxes.

  • I don't think I follow was you mean by "real" property.

  • Correction: 'what' not 'was'.

  • I am glad to see that this video has reached over 1,000 views, but most of you are not going on to watch the other parts. Please, it only gets better!

Top Comments

  • @RationalDischarge There is order in anarchy; Coming together and making decisions voluntarily, when the need arises. Imho.

  • I have a love/hate relationship with Lysander Spooner. I love him because his writings are so incredibly thought-provoking, morally consistent, and logically irreproachable. But I hate him because he made the idea of "limited government" look absolutely ridiculous to me, and popped my wishful thinking minarchy bubble forever! Now I'm always depressed and miserable, wondering what can be done to peacefully establish a voluntary society, or at least severely undermine today's non-voluntary one.

see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @clearly When they applied for a position with in that government freely as public servants then yes the constitution must be applied as a contract much like a trustee is obligated to the beneficiary by authority from the grantor.

  • @MaikUniversum what like a parent? what ever happened to Jeffersonian idea of self governing. A child cannot self govern to the extent of there parent. No the true force in government should be of that of advice that is it and if an injury occurs then the common law and equity should be brought forth.

  • @billyjoejimbob75 And a federal citizenship called US citizen. All oaths are under USC title 8 section 1481. The natural citizenship is the state proof is the birth certificate is a state issued document. If you understand this a cool site to visit is state-citizen (dot) org ran by a fellow named Richard MC Donald. Another case to prove all laws congress creates is solely for government IE administrative laws is Yickwo V Hopkins 118 US 356.

  • @billyjoejimbob75 the constitution was only for governmnet employees just like the 14th amendment was Most rulings on this subject point to blacks but rather if you read it carefully you will see an oath is included which now creates a joiner to the statement "and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. See an oath is required if one is to leave there natural citizenship. And it just so happens to exist 2 such in the Bounds of these united states,. Sate Citizenship natural

  • What lysander spooner fails to understand is trust law and probate law think why do people call the originators of the constitution founding FATHERS. Tell me something if someone creates something can it not be passed down to an heir or an assign? what is a perpetual union? The constitution is not a contract because a contract is something for something. Rather its a trust. Grantor trustee beneficiary relationship. Which is how they converted a public trust into a corporation in 1871.

  • Same thing can be said about the Bible and the State of Israel....

  • I'm glad that Marc Stevens made this, but he is mistaken thinking that this man was an Agorist like himself. He was an individualist yes, but not a capitalist.

  • I suppose none of the people defending it on here have ever tried to use it in their defense in court just to be told that they weren't a party to the constitution so it doesn't apply to them.

  • @1NWOMD what about judges claiming "the constitution is not relevant"?

  • Thank you for posting this.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more