saxo vts test
Top Comments
All Comments (89)
-
@Testostrone250 Yeah, i thought it was 7.6 secs aswell :s
-
On one hand, superb little hot (warm these days) hatch. On the other, a badly built plasticky bag of shit.
-
8.9??? lol i must have a freak vts then mine does it 7.6
-
@antonyr123, Yeah i never said there were going to be quicker! VTS's are alot quicker as they have a 16v engine with 20bhp more and a different box. Well its a n/a 1.6 its not gonna be stupidly quick unless forced induction was used! Its not as fast as alot of cars in a straight line but the 106 gti (which is the same chassis as the VTR/VTS) was voted second best handling in some top gear episode and it was against ferraris and shit. handling > power (where i live anyways)
-
@rumble291 vtr are still slower then vts no matter how u look at it lol
since when was 8.9 seconds worth talking about
-
@LIP15, Stop chatting shit. 170bhp in a 920kg car is overkill for most road users not only does it increase insurance prices and fuel prices by having forced induction but it also will increase the amount of fatalities caused by having too much power in a car that weighs practically nothing. There cheap, nippy and great handling cars full stop.
-
my mk2 vtr does 0-60 in 8.8 seconds with 3 people in the car....
-
@druide106 lol
-
@deviljamez Last car i owned was a merc ml
-
@WillJPalmer haha hardly, as apposed to a ford puma or vauxhall tigra, or do oyu have one of them ^_^
PSA Group 4 Ever... saxo vts is one of the fastest car in its category and with few money can be tuned up to 150-170 hp...
Ninjatasos 2 years ago 20
faster than a trashmerican Corvette, enough said!
druide106 1 year ago 14