Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

NEW LABOUR SAY REPOSSESSION IS BEST FOR BRITISH FAMILIES - 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
42 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 10, 2010

NEW LABOUR SAY REPOSSESSION IS BEST FOR BRITISH FAMILIES - 1


NEW LABOUR is it not a euphemism for the Conservative Party - neo-Conservatism?
NEW LABOUR has attacked Council Tenants & Housing Association Tenants
Now called Tenant Management Organization ("TMO") Tenants [ex Council Tenants] and Registered Social Landlord" ("RSL") [ex Housing Association] Tenants.

NEW LABOUR introduced "Rent Re-Structuring" to increase the lower rents of TMO & RSL properties to Private rental levels.
NEW LABOUR introduced "Town and Country Planning Act 1990 section 106" which ensures NEW LABOUR can Gerrymander in order to build its voter base from non indigenous core voters who tend to vote for the government that provided them with their property.

NEW LABOUR is putting increasing emphasis on providing affordable housing through the planning system. The aim is to ensure that land is made available, developers make a financial contribution and new housing is built within mixed communities. This policy is being modified through new planning guidance, which will be published later in the year. "Planning Gain and Affordable Housing" is the first full-scale evaluation of how the policy is working, and provides important evidence on how it can best be improved [to sway the vote in favour of the Government's gerrymandering initiative].

The report analyses the number of homes being provided through s106 and rural exception sites policies. It also looks at how and why provision varies between regions, the attributes of local policies, and the complex negotiations around planning obligations as well as reviewing how those involved view the process. The study also provides evidence of the costs of building affordable homes in different contexts, looks at who pays, and considers how much of the housing is truly additional to what would otherwise have been built. Based on this evidence the authors assess the potential output were the policy to be fully effective and how this compares to the numbers of affordable homes actually required.

They conclude that the policys current success lies primarily in changing the geography of new provision of affordable housing towards London and the South East but it does little to add to the total number of affordable homes.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more