National Geographic Science & Conspiracy Part 10

National Geographic Science & Conspiracy Part 10

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• National
• Geographic
• Science
• and
• Conspiracy
• debunking
• 9/11
• conspiracy
• theories
• nanothermite
• thermite
• demolition
• wtc
• richard
• gage
• steven
• jones
• dylan
• avery
• loose
• change
• ae911truth
• nist

[AceofDlamonds]

@amh4176

Loose Change is just about the most biased, one-sided, and unprofessional bullshit I've ever seen on YouTube.

[AceofDlamonds]

@RummelsdorfLabs

Harrit's paper isn't peer reviewed properly!! do you know anything about peer review??!! look at the authors for fucks sake....they are truthers themselves and fence-sitters. You can't publish it in a reputable journal that way, no wonder they did it with Bentham.Take Harrit's paper, walk to your nearest University, take it to the department of engineering/tech or chemistry/physics, and present it as a properly written scientific paper. I guarantee you it will be rejected.

[MrNoblemanoflove]

Sad to see NG, as well as so many ppl being played for a fool and used like a tool. "Experts" will tell you how a blatant lie in now held as truth.

[m015094]

SUNY Purchase is part of the conspiracy because they didn't admit Dylan Avery into the film school.  Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

[MegaYeshua33]

@enjoiwrx heat softens steel, How do you know that was not molten glass pouring from the corner of wtc2. I could care less what any president has to say. When 911 happened i thought it was great that the 3rd world finally struck back. To be honest. Also some of the people jumping out of the building were on fire.

[enjoiwrx]

@MegaYeshua33 Footage of Firefighters talking about how they were inside one of the towers and they described it "looks like a foundry". Did you see those iron workers cutting steel? High amounts of heat can bend steel like we saw that day and days after. Your telling me fire from a burning building was hot enough to do that? I thought it was only hot enough to weaken the steel? Your in denial until you can answer these. One day you will learn the truth and remember how foolish you were.

[enjoiwrx]

@MegaYeshua33 Its obvious you like to believe liars like bush and obama. When you can explain to me why there was molten metal underneath ground zero for months i will leave you alone. Explain in some of the footage you can see molten metal coming out from the towers close to impact point. Don't even come to me with "because of the jet fuel it was so hot", yet you can see victims waving for help in the two giant holes. Are you in denial sir? The beams were bent from a high amt of heat, explain??

[MegaYeshua33]

@enjoiwrx That steel was cut by iron workers after the towers fell, Another richard gage theory proving wrong. Why do you believe AE for truth when their leader is consistently caught lying.

[enjoiwrx]

@MegaYeshua33 i admit i am wrong about the difference in planes. Yet you still ignore the other facts i have asked you. Why are you afraid?? Even pictures of the aftermath show beams that were cut at angles like at a demolition. Why would i have a tutor who ignores everything else. I may not be a pilot or an architecht but there are thousands who call bullshit. Architects and engineers for 9/11 truth, Pilots for 9/11 truth. They put their jobs on the line not me. Why believe when they always lie

[MegaYeshua33]

@enjoiwrx The core only supported 60% of the weight. And you made the claims that there were no difference between a 747 and a 737. Witch proved you do not fact check anything you say, and that you just make up shit up and call it the truth. And yes the columns did go from top to bottom of the buildings. They were all connected to one another. And by the way you did not even know what type of planes hit the building. If you would like me to be your tutor anymore you will need to pay me.

[enjoiwrx]

@MegaYeshua33 You still didn't answer any of the facts i asked you. Did the planes cut through the concrete support columns which is what supports all the weight? 60 to 70% of the beams, wow, i didn't know the planes hit multiple points up and down the towers. Why was concrete pulverized? Why did the buildings fall at free fall speeds which means no resistance. Why was there molten metal below ground zero for months? Massive fires, thats why FD said they could knock it out with two lines.

[MegaYeshua33]

@enjoiwrx No two 767s cut through the structure of the buildings, causing massive fires witch heated the steel weakening it until total collapse. If a 747 would of hit it. It probably would of knocked out 60 to 70% of the beams and instantly dropped it. And if it were to of hit it low enough maybe even toppled it over sideways killing even more people. Thank god they were to stupid to use 747s. And if they were such complete liars. Why did they not just plant WMDs in Iraq?