Jermaine Jackson About Islam, Muslim and Michael Jackson

Concerning the personality of wantsex, it's surely also worth pointing out his recent item about "zealous hate-monger[s] who [are] very happy that minarets are getting banned because now he/she can go and fuck there for money because that is why he/she is against Islam."

Yet again, it seems that Muslims will say anything, because they don't have anything worthwhile to say for Islam. If wantsex had a case to make, he would make it. Instead, he fills his space here with groundless raving.

I don't, either, recall who said what, but I'm sure I must have had a good reason to send the "women watch this..." item to someone.

At any rate, I and other readers can surely see by your response how unstable you're so easily made. Surely there's a correlation between such instability and your being a Muslim, a follower of so violent and dishonest a prophet.

While you're calling me a liar, I must ask where your reply is to my recent item from Ibn Kathir's Tafsir of Surah Qur'an 55:72.

I don't know who said what but I just made my case so STOP BOTHERING ME BY SENDING STUPID COMMENTS IN MY INBOX.
LIE ALL YOU WANT ABOUT THE PROPHET YOU ARE MEANT TO PERISH AT THE END YOU BROTHEL-DWELLER.

You can't just see... you have to believe.

Good grief, does Islam own the word prophet now?

moslim for ever we will see in the end

At "women watch this and u would love to be a muslim trust me," a certain anticults, a longtime contributor there, once wrote to me "i will be offended that an inferior asshole like you dare to give me advice," "i will slap your ugly face for daring to even thinking you might be right and i'm wrong !" and "sorry i don't debate asian niggers." If Muslims had a case to make, they would make it. But they have nothing to say, so say it. Surely a thing can be judged by the quality of defense it gets.

Surely never outside Islam in all of history have people who hope to interest others in their message allowed themselves to sound the way Muslims here do. The only explanation I can think of is that they feel so good about what they are that they feel above the rules that others live by. So Muslims have always felt they could offer Islam in any way they cared to, including war, and if that message were rejected the fault was entirely with those rejecting it. Muslims are so good they're evil.

"Every innovation is an error"? If Muslims want an honest explanation of "What went wrong?" between the decline of Islam's Golden Age and the discovery of Middle Eastern oil, they should consider the teachings of the man they call their prophet. Violent and dishonest—"War is deceit"—he brooked neither physical nor intellectual challenge to his authority and, using fear of the god he invented to back him up, has kept a lid on Muslims for 1,400 years. Muhammad doomed Islam at its roots.

But Muslims don't want to figure that out. They would far rather blame all sin on others, from the Crusaders—who'd responded to Muslim aggression in Europe and the Judeo-Christian Holy Land—to those who attacked the World Trade Center and Pentagon, said to have been an inside job. They would rather cringe under the imagined authority of the god who Muhammad said made him second in command than do the thinking that could gain the creative freedom that nature obviously meant humanity to use.