Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Laws of Logic 3 Law of Non-contradiction

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,243
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Jun 10, 2008

The necessary and universal Law of Non-contradiction requires an immutable foundation.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Goddoesexist)

  • FF: I start with a theistic a priori apodictic principal not on the principal of utility.

    The primary world view option of non-theism is the aim of utility. Another possible option is the atheist Nietzsche's anti-rational supposition that the "world is false, contradictory, senseless... we need lies to vanquish this reality, this truth." Either non-theistic starting point leads to absurdity.

  • All schools of logic: mathematical, formal, predicate, deductive, etc, all schools, forms and types of modern logic necessarily utilize the Laws of Logic.

    The immaterial, universal, immutable laws of Logic have always been, are, and always will be; not so with the material cosmos.

    God alone who is immaterial, universal, immutable and hash always been, is, and always will be can ground them.

  • Knowledge = x1, x2,...xN in which differing and distinct categories and properties inhere and are unified by another thing that must have those essential categories and properties and more. Theism lays the ground for x1-xN and brings unity to the diversity of the categories/properties therein. Materialism cannot account for x1-xN and cannot account for knowledge.

see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Goddoesexist

    how can you debate about "non-theistic starting points" and argue from supposed "a priori apodictic principles (not principals~)", ie Divine Command Theory rather than Utilitarianism or Consequentialism, when no god's commands can be the true source of good? This kind of feeble theistic reasoning was disproved soundly by Socrates 2400yr ago.

    & it would help your position if you didn't sound like you were reading from queue cards but speaking from experience or personal knowledge

  • You need to simplify the argument you put forward. I understand what you are saying but you need an example, like;

    "Can there be Prohibition Laws if there is no alcohol?"

    "Can there be anti-cigarette Laws if there are no cigarettes?"

    "How can there be Atheism if there is nothing to Atheit?"

  • You believe the most default setting for any existence is god. If nothing caused god, and he did not cause himself, then all his traits are a random precondition to existence.

    If logic is just a random precodition to existence then i think that sum's up logic right there.

    Where's my cookie?

  • wow, that was worthless.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more