Uploaded by Goddoesexist on Jun 10, 2008
The necessary and universal Law of Non-contradiction requires an immutable foundation.
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (Goddoesexist)
All Comments (4)
-
how can you debate about "non-theistic starting points" and argue from supposed "a priori apodictic principles (not principals~)", ie Divine Command Theory rather than Utilitarianism or Consequentialism, when no god's commands can be the true source of good? This kind of feeble theistic reasoning was disproved soundly by Socrates 2400yr ago.
& it would help your position if you didn't sound like you were reading from queue cards but speaking from experience or personal knowledge
jamesejudy3 5 months ago
-
You need to simplify the argument you put forward. I understand what you are saying but you need an example, like;
"Can there be Prohibition Laws if there is no alcohol?"
"Can there be anti-cigarette Laws if there are no cigarettes?"
"How can there be Atheism if there is nothing to Atheit?"
Funkyflorist 2 years ago
-
You believe the most default setting for any existence is god. If nothing caused god, and he did not cause himself, then all his traits are a random precondition to existence.
If logic is just a random precodition to existence then i think that sum's up logic right there.
Where's my cookie?
butlerl 3 years ago
-
wow, that was worthless.
neveruse513 3 years ago
4:08Aristotle VS Platoby xxacexx225,151 views
2:03Thinking Requires the Laws of Logic which Requi...by Goddoesexist1,694 views
1:57Laws of Logic 1by Goddoesexist4,127 views
7:55What is the law of non contradiction?by theapologetic315148 views
2:10Why do we start with the Greeks? P2by DarienR1,075 views
1:57On that the Laws of Logic are Properties of the...by muffin1102386 views
0:41The Law of Non-Contradiction-KJVonlyby kruzer32222 views
5:00Introduction to Logicby kyphilosopher7,606 views
8:42The Law of Non-Contradiction and the Trinityby rzimmedia120,431 views
3:04Three Minute Philosophy: Heraclitus & Parmenidesby CollegeBinary89,009 views
1:23God Exists: Logic V. Laws of Logicby Goddoesexist900 views
4:00Is there only one way to God?by cccomaha94 views
2:12God Necessarily Exists: Theism, Non-theism, Ord...by Goddoesexist1,060 views
6:26Logic, 3 - the Rules (Take Notes)by MrCropper2,526 views
4:41Impregnable Proof for Theismby Goddoesexist618 views
3:54God Must Exist Yet Hitchens & Harris Talk Trashby Goddoesexist9,200 views
4:00Logic 101: The Law of Identityby LaughingMan0X4,501 views
2:37Problems in Epistemology and Thoughtby Goddoesexist1,036 views
9:03Refuting Rand Is Simpleby Goddoesexist2,951 views
- Loading more suggestions...
FF: I start with a theistic a priori apodictic principal not on the principal of utility.
The primary world view option of non-theism is the aim of utility. Another possible option is the atheist Nietzsche's anti-rational supposition that the "world is false, contradictory, senseless... we need lies to vanquish this reality, this truth." Either non-theistic starting point leads to absurdity.
Goddoesexist 2 years ago
All schools of logic: mathematical, formal, predicate, deductive, etc, all schools, forms and types of modern logic necessarily utilize the Laws of Logic.
The immaterial, universal, immutable laws of Logic have always been, are, and always will be; not so with the material cosmos.
God alone who is immaterial, universal, immutable and hash always been, is, and always will be can ground them.
Goddoesexist 2 years ago
Knowledge = x1, x2,...xN in which differing and distinct categories and properties inhere and are unified by another thing that must have those essential categories and properties and more. Theism lays the ground for x1-xN and brings unity to the diversity of the categories/properties therein. Materialism cannot account for x1-xN and cannot account for knowledge.
Goddoesexist 2 years ago