Sarah Palin: "They're Not Going to Shut Me Up"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
908 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 18, 2011

Nancy Cordes reports on Sarah Palin's appearance on Fox News where she blamed the media for trying to destroy her message and defended her use of crosshair graphics and the term, "blood libel."

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (67)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheRationalBeing k.m.a.

  • @TheReformed1 Look, shit of this nature takes a lot of time to discuss and plan out. I have too much going on at this time in my life and don't have time for these dead end discussions. You are stuck in a mindset of only being able to see life through your perspective alone, which if fine. Its your prerogative to do so. I'm just sorry that the world has people like you in it. You are not even close to experienced in world cultures, and your words show this. Remain ignorant. Have fun.

  • @TheReformed1 If I don't get right back to you it is because I have a life. For christians, there is only one way, and that is it. Would you allow gay marriage? Would you be a proponent of bombing abortion clinics? How tolerant would christianity be toward other religions? You brought up the crusades, but did you know that it was Muslims who allowed christians and jews to still practice their religion in Jerusalem. Christians threw the others out.

  • @TheRationalBeing What's the matter buddy???? Did I ask you a question that your relativistic ( fence straddling ) position in life doesn't want to answer? Try it again. Why do you think of christianity as a tyrannical ideology?

  • @TheRationalBeing Why do you think of christianity as a tyrannical ideology?

  • @TheReformed1 See, here is where you need to think a little more. Who said there is only one fence and I'm sitting in the middle? I don't choose a side in this conflict because I feel both sides are irrational. I'm sitting on another fence making sure neither one accomplishes what it preaches and both stay the fuck out of my yard. I'm on the front lines, just not in your battle if you are choosing one of these sides.

    So where do you see a difference?

  • @TheReformed1 There would be no difference in world domination. Both would kill to gain, and both would use a tyrannical ideology to maintain supremacy. Freedoms would be lost, books burned, people killed and imprisoned for wayward thought. There is no difference.

  • I never said I sat the fence on everything. Look at you, disregarding everything I told you that you are wrong about, and using one thing that you think makes me weak. At least I can think for myself without being sucked into an ideology that tells me what to think and do. I am conservative and liberal, depending on the issue. You live in a world of fear which drives you to hate people you do not know, and despise anyone who doesn't conform to your way of thinking.

  • @TheRationalBeing WOW! Really??? Did you vote in the 08' election for president?

  • @TheRationalBeing Fence sitting is not objectivity. It is the inability to make a solid decision and stand by it. That's wonderful that you want to elevate all that you do to a much higher level, than what it is, but again, you're a plain old fence strattler.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more