Noah's Impossible Ark
Uploader Comments (LadyOfThinking)
Top Comments
-
@warren52nz Following up on my last comment the Pagan ritual of slaughtering farmyard animals to remove human sin is where "scapegoat" came from.
And if you don't believe sacrifice was something Christianity embraces let me quote from the Bible. Ahem:
Genesis 8:21 "And the LORD was pleased with the aroma of the sacrifice and said to himself, "I will never again curse the ground because of the human race..."
If he said it to himself, how do we know he said it at all ???
Just plain stupid!!!
All Comments (117)
-
@RuinSonic: Good point I think the assumption is they have to engage in a peculiar form of Willful Cognitive Dissonance in order to hold onto their "faith" when the "Good Book" is so demonstrably deficient. In order to remain "Christian" and not become sort of Deistic in their outlook (a worthy religion for a scientist, if they wanted to go beyond merely human spirituality, but still one with no hard evidence). That's sort of the same schtick as Apologists are engaged in.
-
And thus the phrase "Incest is Wincest" was created [Genesis 19:33].
-
@LadyOfThinking I find it more amazing to watch the countless rings the relgiious will jump through to hold onto their bronze age ideals.
-
@RyuDarragh The question remains, why are their creationist "scientists"/apologists? If you believe all this than obviously it's a miracle. Who in their right mind would say how science supports their hypothesis and then has to insert 20 miracles or ad hoc claims to get it off the ground. Of course when you want to fit in you have to pretend like you childish material is more sophisticated.
-
@j919or Even if your correct that it's possible assuming 100's of ad hoc spectacular claims about the past, why wouldn't you just say it's a miracle anyways? Is God a conspiracist or is he trying to fool people?
-
Why didn't god just rapture all the animal species and send them back after the flood was over? After all Revelations claims god will rapture Christians and send them back after he wreaks a similar havoc on the world. But it seems this time god doesn't give a shit about the animal species cuz he's going to let them be destroyed along with the rest of the human race during the tribulation period.
1. Animals eat alot journey to the ark and then hybernate
2. There were not the number of species then as today
3. There wasnt the salt content then as now.
4. Yall know there are 2 sides to this and yall have shown ur hostility towards God
5. Repent and yield to the changing/restoring power of God or enter into eternal death.
j919or 2 weeks ago
@j919or I think this comment is a perfect example of just how hostile religion can be. "Repent and yield to the changing/restoring power of God or enter into eternal death." So either become a slave for religious texts or die and be tortured eternally.
LadyOfThinking 2 weeks ago 3
"God" had to do a lot of the work. Direct intervention. Mind control for all the animals (but, if he did that, why send Noah to gather them, why not have them deliver themselves). "super evolution" to make those few animals into many (then, too, why not just send a small number and do that... hey, why bother with the animals at all? Why not "super evolve" Noah and company?), then "Insta Plants" that sprout from seeds left over after the flood... wait, my logic may be faulty here...
RyuDarragh 4 weeks ago 2
@RyuDarragh I have yet to find a flaw. Keep going ;)
LadyOfThinking 4 weeks ago