STOP ANIMAL TESTING - http://rameshkukathas.sampasite.com

"Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are like us.' Ask the experimenters why it is morally OK to experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are not like us.' Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction."
-Professor Charles R. Magel

As many as 115 million animals are experimented on and killed in laboratories in the U.S. every year. Much of the experimentation-including pumping chemicals into rats' stomachs, hacking muscle tissue from dogs' thighs, and putting baby monkeys in isolation chambers far from their mothers-is paid for by you, the American taxpayer and consumer, yet you can't visit a laboratory and see how the government has spent your money. You can't even get an accurate count on the number of animals killed every year because experimenters and the government have decided that mice and rats and certain other animals don't even have to be counted.

Animal experimentation is a multibillion-dollar industry fueled by massive public funding and involving a complex web of corporate, government, and university laboratories, cage and food manufacturers, and animal breeders, dealers, and transporters. The industry and its people profit because animals, who cannot defend themselves against abuse, are legally imprisoned and exploited.

www.rameshkukathas.sampasite.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• animal
• testing
• Ask
• the
• experimenters
• why
• they
• experiment
• on
• animals
• and
• answer
• is:
• 'Because
• are
• like

[sakuraGirl10]

Well they don't deserve this. They have lives and feelings too. Just tell me this would you like to get tortured like they do. They are just poor defensless animals that deserve to live to.

[aviebaby4]

YOUR life has been saved by animal testing on multiple occasions. All of you.

[sauroman1]

Something bad happened to human civilization. Ancient time people loved and protected nature, lived in harmony with it. But today most of the people consider it just to be a resourse. There is spiritual way to live and have technology without ruining planet.

[veritusetmensmentis5]

Reading the comments here, how this experimentation continues is relatively obvious. Both sides do little more than bicker of morality, failing to do any real research.

Cell cultures, eye banks, stem cell, and possibly in vitro (once developed) are more modern, accurate measures of testing. Morality doesn't have to be questioned anymore. The process is simply outdated.

Alternated aren't told by media due to companies using animal experiments as an excuse when their product fails.

[Gurgleschlortz]

@SimmehX3 How about you read my original response some more before saying anything else stupid, kiddo. Your response was invalid because it did not actually address anything I said in my response. Based on this information, we can see that it is your argument that is invalid.

[SimmehX3]

@Gurgleschlortz Your argument is invalid, is that better? :)

[Gurgleschlortz]

@SimmehX3 What an intelligent response, you managed to avoid responding to anything I said and still make yourself look stupid. Good job there, idiot. I'm going to leave you to figure out what you did wrong on your own. Don't bother talking to me until you come up with something valid.

[SimmehX3]

@Gurgleschlortz i'm pretty sure you're a waste of my time, You're as ignorant as i am so lets keep it that way :) Humans have life spam just like other animals so theres no point in arguing in such a dum topic i mean we all r gonna be dead some day now toughen up because thats the truth .

[noratmedicine]

@43Coda Thanks Coda. While i agree with your sentiment its importnat to know that animal experiments do not cure cancer or any disease and in fact cause many of them eg warnings were kept off cigarette lables for 10 years by animal 'tests'. While people believe tha tthis saves their lives they will never want it stopped. If you want to stop it use the science/human health argument see safermedieines. net vivisectioninformation. com mrmcmed. org navs. org Thanks

[Gurgleschlortz]

@noratmedicine You disappoint me. You keep coming back with an argument that has no relevance, of course I know mice aren't predictive for humans, but I never said I was rooting for either side. As I recall, I mention the stupidity of the commenters and their constant complaining about little more than a handfull of organisms. I wish to also point out that you are the most ignorant, stupid, and repetitive person I have ever seen.

[Gurgleschlortz]

@noratmedicine You are so stupid it is unbelievable. I never said anything about animal testing in my original statements. You have yet to come up with a valid reason as to why you people act so fucking retarded. The world is literally falling apart around us and you people are STILL complaining about some lesser animals you'll probably forget about 3 days later. You take quotes from websites and call it a debate, but I call it denial.

[noratmedicine]

The US National Cancer Institute also undertook a 35 year screening programme, testing 400,000 plant species on animals for anti-tumour activity. Out of the outrageously expensive research, many positive results surfaced in animal models, but not a single benefit emerged for humans. As a result, the NCI now uses human cancer cells for cytotoxic screening.[25]

25# Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, Volume II Animal Models Svendensen and Hau (Eds.) CRC Press 1994 p4."