Watch a Real Controlled Demolition, 9/11 Truthers

Stupid 9/11 truthers. Somehow a building collapsing straight down from the top to the bottom with debris from the building flying off in all different directions is supposed to look like a controlled demolition?

Sorry. Not buying it.

Compare the WTC collapse (not shown here because i'm sure it's already burned into our memories forever) to this actual controlled demolition of the Frontier Casino in Las Vegas in November 2007.

Notice how the two are different?

The bottom explodes first, then the left side of the building falls before the right side. Notice how in a controlled demolition the floors don't pancake on top of one another all of the way down?

I included some audio of noted truther Rosie O'Donnell for comedic effect.

Anyways, if you still believe 9/11 was an inside job after this, just shut up and cut of your satchel, because you're hopeless and shouldn't reproduce.

For more entertaining mockery of liberal and lunacy (redundant, i know) check out MikeChurch.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• 9-11
• Truthers
• truth
• building
• collapse
• demolition
• theory
• mike
• church
• show
• king
• dude
• conspiracy
• political
• news
• debunk

[belowthepovertyline]

Wow, look at all that dust! Hey Judy Wood, are you watching?

[Garet93K]

this is just my personal opinion on the matter

[Garet93K]

here is the difference between this controlled demolition and the world trade centers. this demo is on a building that is wider than tall, where as the world trade centers were tall and fairly skinny. if you watch a controlled demolition of a hotel building it shows it does the exact same thing the wtc did when it "collapsed". sorry but i believe that 9/11 was a government conspiracy to invade the middle east for their vast amounts of oil.. i am not disrespecting the victims at all.

[ifeelfine90]

@jazzfan5000- Your arguement neglects the fact that fire is said to have caused the global collapse of the twin towers. If you say it did, but the impacts were major factors as well, you must forget about building 7. Which is understandable because everyone else, like you, that believes the main stream media report avoids this subject like the plauge. Do your research, and come back when you appriciate the entire situation. And not just the bits and pieces you choose to mention.

[jazzfan5000]

@ifeelfine90 The core column did not completely vanish, it collapsed with the rest of the building. You, and the rest of your truther buddies, seem to forget that two jets hit these buildings. The ipact of these jets compromised the strength of the structure.

[ifeelfine90]

Also. This buildings structure is different. The twin towers had a massive core colum that in no way should have completely vanshied. No matter how hot that fire was to make the floors magicaly "pancake", the colums would have been normal strength the farther they got from the fire; even IF the fires had weakened them in any way. So OP is still a dumb ass giving no evidence for their arguement.

Go figure.

[rbl777]

@ifeelfine90 rofl nice

and yeah this video is obviously terrible. not like there is ONE single way of controlled demolition..

[kaskadaks]

Argument from authority and personal attacks. That's 911 debunking in a nutshell.

[psmtheman]

Um... where was the pancake from the world trade centers? Its a physical impossibility for the floors to pancake on top of each other and not slow down.. Each floor has a force acting on it keeping it from moving. Each floor would cause all the other floors that hit it to slow down. They would not be able to fall at the rate that they fell with the current laws of physics. They would not be able to fall at that same rate of speed with out actually ACCELERATING through each other.

[lamiac2411]

There are different types of controlled demolitions. I remember watching a 9/11 documentary in where they showed about 6 different buildings being destroyed by controlled demolition and they put the wtc buildings collapse side by side and u couldn't even tell a damn bit of difference. So the only thing this video proves is that the maker is an idiot. I am sure he thinks this proves something and I am sure in his mind he feels like he is the ultimate debunker. Nope, just a dip shit