9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!

Bombs, explosions, secondary explosions, explosive devices....how many more times do we need to hear these words being said by 9/11 witnesses before we start asking questions about what really happened on that awful day?

All of the individual news reports in this video can be found on YouTube and other video sites. This video shows that many actual 9/11 witnesses heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell. These witnesses include police, firemen and reporters.

And what is even more shocking is the fact that all of this has been largely ignored by the mainstream media after the day itself.

For those debunkers who wish to keep saying that the explosions were caused by gas lines, please save your breath. All of the three buildings that were blown up on 9/11 were all Class-A buildings. This means that gas lines were not permitted because the buildings had to comply with the safety regulations set out for Class-A buildings. So there were no gas lines!

We really need to wake up to the facts and ask questions. If we don't, what does that say about us?

Sorry about the sync loss with the audio. All of these news clips are available elsewhere on YouTube as well as in the archives of the main news media sites.

LEARN THE REAL TRUTH AT http://rabbithole2.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• explosions
• bombs
• controlled
• demolition
• 911
• WTC7
• twin
• towers
• devices
• conspiracy
• truth
• illuminati
• big
• secret
• the
• ultimate
• con
• lucus
• economy
• warfare
• collapse
• construction
• trade center
• world trade
• wtc

[cshargeit]

they just said newport beach is crawlin with fbi and such.. the other population of newport is section 8 and various recant of drugs and its all bullshit.

[aczjbr]

The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Comments

On the “Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7, August 2007”

Prepared and Issued by The National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) as a Draft Report for Public Comment October 2008.

Compiled by the CTBUH Fire & Safety Working Group

Chaired by Simon Lay and Daniel O’Connor

Principal Authors

David Scott • CTBUH, Arup

Simon Lay • WSP

Daniel O’Connor • Schirmer Engineering

[aczjbr]

w w w . ctbuh . org / Portals / 0/ People /WorkingGroups/Fire&Safety/CTB­UH_NISTwtc7_%20DraftReport.pdf

[ThePinkBunnySHILL]

@ucancallmeOh Satan directly and Willingly.

There was another man who had some of the same dreams, and that man was (Martin Luther King.)

Though our colors are different, our dreams of universal peace, we shared alike.

[ThePinkBunnySHILL]

@ucancallmeOh w w w . jewfaq . org / index . h t m

Zionist/Israelis/Jews... I was looking for grants, and a group was (INACCURATELY) listed. I asked for more info, and they very nicely offered me the above address. These people are *VERY KIND!* They are Very Peaceful... But People Like You Wanna Make Them Out To Be Killers. I Should Say Like Us, Cause I Am Partly All Religious Beliefs.

I believe in a world where all religious beliefs make peace with one and other, unless they are worshiping

[ucancallmeOh]

@ThePinkBunnySHILL ~ If the nano-thermite went off and caused extremely high temperatures, wouldn't that only be for the 10-11 seconds that the towers are collapsing? Then wouldn't that high temperature get dispersed in the open air of the collapsing building?

I'm not a physicist, or even a techie, but your argument doesn't seem to work. Also, your insistence on stating "thermite" when it was "nano-thermite" proves your intellectual dishonesty.

Not one scientist has refuted the paper (below)

[ThePinkBunnySHILL]

@ucancallmeOh 907 °C (1,665 °F), which is about 1,370 °C (2,500 °F) below the temperature at which thermite burns) could potentially spray superheated boiling metal violently into the air if near a thermite reaction

Where was this Violent disbursal of metal, (Materials)?

Softly flowing unidentified material of some type was spotted, but it was NOT THERMITE. (could potentially spray superheated boiling metal violently into the air if near a thermite reaction)

[ThePinkBunnySHILL]

@ucancallmeOh "~ paper: "Active Thermitic Material Found in the Dust of the World Trade Center Catastrophe" by Harrit et al."

Where I tend to get confused here is, you people insist there were (No reported temperatures over like 1500 degrees, yet insist Thermite was used.

Thermite can easily hit temperatures over 2400 degrees, yet you insist those temperatures didn't exist.

en . wikipedia. or g / wiki / Thermite#Hazards

boiling point of 907 °C (1,665 °F), which is about 1,370 °C (2,500 °F)

Cond.