On This Day - February 1 - Janet Jackson's breast was revealed during a Super Bowl performance

This was the day that Janet Jackson's breast was exposed during a performance with Justin Timberlake at the Super Bowl and the Columbia shuttle disintegrated as it re-entered the Earth's atmosphere.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• world
• history
• ondaythisday
• onthisday
• year
• day
• timeline
• week
• month
• happened
• highlights
• news
• events
• education
• janet
• jackson
• breast
• exposed
• performance
• super
• bowl
• justin
• timberlake
• columbia
• shuttle
• disintergrate
• earth
• atmosphere
• space
• nasa
• united
• arab
• republic
• syria
• egypt
• andrew
• Kehoe
• murder
• school

[VlaDZeroOrDie]

I usually like your videos, is just that I don't see why is the Janet Jackson's breast relevant. -__-

[mindstormd]

Exposed.

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 Oh religions have been proven wrong time and time again. Theism has not (and I have no problem with the idea of something having created us). It's organized religion that's bs and lies. Go back and read what I've written. In short the idea of a creator = maybe not likely but believable. The idea that this "creator" meddles in peoples lives for being logical = not believable.

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo CONT It is definitely not my one. Nor has theism ever been disproved, and there are many solid logical proofs for theism. I would not be in my religion any more had I not researched it and found it to be extremely likely to be true (the same is not even possible of atheism, since it is a negative claim).

If you would really like to, I can point you in the direction of some videos which I think provide damn good evidence for, for starters, theism.

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo Ok. You should know that first off, making sweeping statements about entire areas of life (without clearly even knowing what they are, I might add), commits the fallacy of faulty generalisation. Your 'definition' of religion is not one you'd find anywhere, nor is it provable, let alone falsifiable. It's a bare assertion.

Now, 'religion' has not been proven wrong once. Sometimes you might show a single religion to be false, but it is not likely one of the surviving ones. CONT

[SilentlySearching]

@VlaDZeroOrDie boobs are always relevant

[KevlarNinja]

Bath school disaster. That does not ring a bell.

[erc355]

Omg. Were still talking about this craziness

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 "I like to understand things before making a judgement on them."

Religion = a primitive way of brainwashing people before a time of laws. Understanding enough? I think believing in things without evidence that has been proven wrong before is the irrational thing to do not the other way around.

"Yes. And we both know that was a joke."

Like religion?

About gunpowder in my coutnry it's classified (and always has been used) as a "propellant" and not an explosive

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo You write off entire studies, entire areas of life (like religion)? Forgive me if that doesn't seem rational to me. I like to understand things before making a judgement on them.

Yes. And we both know that was a joke.

Now we're talking about the use of gunpowder? No, sir. Allow me to move the goalposts back to where they were: we were discussing its nature. Though I agree that it wouldn't have the 'desired effect' for suicide bombing.

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 Well what I've been talking about in the first place is religion but obviously want to discuss fireworks and explosives (because you know religion fails:) so gonna have a crack at this.

The original thing you picked up on is that arabs didn't invent explosives...they still didn't.

Gunpowders main use is to propel not to blast. Go back and check to see what we were talking about was suicidebombers. Gunpowder wouldn't work too good. Here we have no distinction:)