9/11 - The Toronto Hearings - 09/08/11 - Kevin Ryan - 03:13PM.flv

2:45 -- 4:15 Kevin Ryan: Inadequacies of the Reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology

The Toronto Hearings were held at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada, during the 10th anniversary weekend of 9/11.

September 11, 2011 marks the 10th anniversary of the events in New York and Washington that have played a dramatic role in modern history. These events have provided a pretext for a War on Terror that has replaced the Cold War as a global conflict framework within which military invasions and occupations have taken place, as well as violations of international law and human rights and a widespread assault on the civil rights crucial to democracies. Global military spending, which began a rapid downswing after the end of the Cold War, has, with the help of the official account of the 9/11 attacks, risen to Cold War levels and continues to rise. The focus on military solutions to complex human problems has sidetracked humanity at the very moment when international cooperation is most required to address genuine challenges that humanity faces.

In the meantime, the credibility of the official reports on the 9/11 attacks (by the 9/11 Commission, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other government or government-appointed agencies) has been questioned by millions of citizens in the United States and abroad, including victim family members, expert witnesses and international legal experts.

The International Center for 9/11 Studies has therefore decided to sponsor four days of International Hearings in the city of Toronto, Canada on the 10th anniversary of the events of September 11, 2001. During these Hearings, which will be broadcasted via the Internet, various expert witnesses will present the best available evidence into the case, discovered in the ten years since the 9/11 events occurred.

For more information please visit:

http://torontohearings.org/

http://rememberbuilding7.org/10/
http://www.ic911studies.org/
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org/

http://911speakout.org/
http://911research.wtc7.net/
http://www.911timeline.net/

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Kevin
• Ryan
• National
• Institute
• of
• Standards
• and
• Technology
• Toronto
• Hearings
• 9/11
• 911
• September
• 11
• 11th
• international
• canada
• ryerson
• university
• nanothermite
• wtc
• world
• trade
• center
• truth
• controlled
• demolition
• thermite
• richard
• gage
• architects
• engineers
• investigation
• lady
• gaga
• justin
• bieber
• katy
• perry

[WhatsReallyGoingOnUS]

@12weasel100 Kevin Ryan is an expert on the UL fire-loading experiment, which NIST contracted post 9/11 and then ignored when they didn't like the results.

If only the fire-proofing on columns needed to be removed, then why did the floor trusses supposedly displace by 45 inches, as NIST claims, causing the outer columns to bow inward? Wouldn't this require large deformation - and therefore large temperatures - in the floor trusses themselves? This requires removing fire-proofing on the trusses.

[WhatsReallyGoingOnUS]

@12weasel100 See the fire in Madrid, Spain in 2004 to see how a building should deform due to fire. Notice the local failures which occur over the 24 hrs that the building burned. It still did not globally collapse even though there were local failures. That is because buildings are designed to re-distribute forces in the event that a single element fails.

Fire cannot cause a building to fail globally and fall at free-fall acceleration. It can only cause a series of local failures.

[MrRobtwothirds]

@ohioguy7

Absolutely I support the hearings and the findings, I was just making a clumsy attempt at satire, saying that believing the official story is as ludicrous as taking the Santa story to be true.

[ohioguy7]

@MrRobtwothirds

so are you critical of the hearings, or

saying they are correct, the Story on

building 7, etc. do not make sense...

7 had planted high tech tnt...absolutely no doubt

and it was highly secured, no Arabs could have

gotten away with it

[911sausageman]

@bomberbruno1 NO WAI

[bomberbruno1]

mini nukes were used to bring down the towers......nuclear demolition

[MrRobtwothirds]

A good presentation, but it is almost absurd,

as it would be if one had to argue that Santa Claus did not deliver everyone's presents on one night.

-If Santa and his reindeer moved at the speed of light he might get it done, but the presents wouldn't survive the handling,

another reason to suspect the official Santa story is that all independent zoologists say that there is no record of reindeer flying, their body shape suggests that even a skilled deer could not even fly a short distance,

[howardtlewisiiiify]

I have some questions for John Skilling. He knows of the preset. Ask him.

[mikecorbeil]

Very good presentation, and Q&A.

[educution]

@12weasel100 The fireproofing isn't time rated based on the time it woult take for firefighters to put out the blaze, the figure is for the MAXIMUM time the blaze would take locally to use up all its fuel (in this case: office contents) and move on to the next area (as fire tends to do). THATS why a protected steel structure has never suffered global collapse prior to the 3 on 911. WE USE FIREPROOFING DESIGNED TO LAST AS LONG AS A FIRE POSSIBLY CAN. Make sense??

[WhatsReallyGoingOnUS]

@12weasel100 See the fire in Madrid, Spain in 2004 to see how a building should deform due to fire. Notice the local failures which occur over the 24 hrs that the building burned. It still did not globally collapse even though there were local failures. That is because buildings are designed to re-distribute forces in the event that a single element fails.

Fire cannot cause a building to fail globally and fall at free-fall acceleration. It can only cause a series of local failures.