Back to the Future Part 3 (8/10) Movie CLIP - Train Ride to the Future (1990) HD

Back to the Future Part 3 Movie Clip - watch all clips http://j.mp/z6iUYa
click to subscribe http://j.mp/sNDUs5

After Marty (Michael J. Fox) helps Emmett (Christopher Lloyd) save Clara (Mary Steenburgen), he is pushed by a train into the future.

TM & © Universal (2012)
Cast: Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Mary Steenburgen
Director: Robert Zemeckis
MOVIECLIPS YouTube Channel: http://j.mp/vqieFG
Join our Facebook page: http://j.mp/tb8OMH
Follow us on Twitter: http://j.mp/rZzGsm
Buy Movie: http://amzn.to/v1PLz0
Producer: Neil Canton, Bob Gale, Kathleen Kennedy, Frank Marshall, Steven Spielberg, Steve Starkey
Screenwriter: Robert Zemeckis, Bob Gale
Film Description: The final installment in the Back to the Future trilogy picks up where the second film left off, but it casts off the dizzying time travel of the first two films for mostly routine comedy set in the Old West. Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox) receives a 70-year-old letter from his inventor friend, Doc Brown (Christopher Lloyd), who tells Marty that he has retreated a century in time to live out a relatively quiet life in the Old West. Doc Brown reveals that he hid his DeLorean car/time machine in an abandoned mine outside town, and when Marty does some research and discovers that the Doc died shortly after writing the letter, he decides to find the car, travel back in time, and warn the Doc about his demise. Meanwhile, the Doc, who has fallen in love with a local woman (Mary Steenburgen), realizes he can't hide in the past from the problems he has caused to the time flow in the previous two adventures. He reluctantly decides to return to the present with Marty, but first, they have to find a way to get the DeLorean up to time-travel velocity with a broken fuel line and no gasoline.

"back to the future part 3","michael j fox","christopher lloyd","mary steenburgen","robert zemeckis","skateboard videos",westerns,"action adventure","ages 11-12","ages 8-10","children family","family sci-fi fantasy","sci-fi fantasy","sci-fi adventure","steven spielberg","kathleen kennedy","frank marshall","steve starkey","neil canton","bob gale","heroism videos","preparation videos","countryside videos","train videos","movie clips",movieclipsdotcom,#AMG:V+++++3673,­/m/0hz_1,/m/01l_yg,/m/014g22

• Category

  Film & Animation

[Twilightcatboy]

YOU have no clue what you're talking about :p

All he's saying is that it's funny how in 1885, trains had a hard time reaching 88 mph, but now they can go like 3x that speed.

[RockBand2Freak78]

They didn't have good CGI in 1990. They used models

[shotdog1980]

Back to the future scene 1

[EPICTHOMASFAN713]

yeah

i think they ran a 1/8 scale (or live steam) locomotive off the cliff, and then probably set off some dynamite to create the explosion (it could have been the locomotive boiler, but it would have probably killed the cameraman)

[Hapydude101]

I love how they bothered to add the train crashing

[GetOverHere83]

At no point did I say it was arrogant to save lives, I said to change history, even with good intentions, may have serious repercussions. Thinking it won't is arrogant. At no point did I say it was exclusively not your place to change history. If you want to retort, act least do so in a less than sanctimonious manner seeing that you've previously accused me taking what you said entirely out of context, only to go on and do it yourself.

[genobahamut1337]

First of all, not only is it theoretical, but it was a joke. Second, you seem to speak as if time is this great thing that should never be changed, or that it's at least not my place to change it but someone else's. Who are you to determine this? If time can be changed, how is it any more arrogant to change that than it is to mess with genetics or figure out quantum mechanics or to do anything else that we do? Drop the high and mighty act. In the long run, saving lives is not arrogant.

[genobahamut1337]

I also never said that you said it will happen. I was working on what you were suggesting and leaning toward and pointing out that it could also not happen, and thus the entire idea that is could is pointless.

[GetOverHere83]

Yes, it's entirely theoretical but at the same time, I don't think it's right to change history for whatever reason, be it preventing Chernobyl, either of the World Wars or any event resulting in many deaths. Yes, it may be callous but it's downright arrogant to think it's your place to change history.

[GetOverHere83]

As you seem to be so fond of keenly observing, my argument never stated a much bigger will happen as a result, I said it could. As you rightly said, my argument was a theoretical situation.

[genobahamut1337]

Now, I have countered your argument by pointing out that preventing a disaster does not mean a disaster much bigger will happen later, nor does it mean we won't learn from it. Allowing it doesn't mean we learn from it either. Your entire argument is a nit-pick which I have pointed out may or may not allow us to learn from it whether the disaster happens or not. It's a fictional situation, not a reality, and saving lives is better than not, especially when it las lasting repercussions.

[genobahamut1337]

It wasn't an issue. Saving lives is generally good. I didn't say one way or the other about anything else. YOU made that up. You invented an imaginary stance for me to hold, which I never held, suggesting that I showed little regard (and you still do) to the consequences when I never showed that I had little regard for it. I could say that you show little regard for life with a suggestion that they shouldn't be saved. Difference is, I know you didn't say that. It's a fictional situation anyway.