Media Malpractice at March for Life

At the 2010 March for Life the media set new standards for journalistic fraud. [Get full video at www.thineeyes.org] In its lead photo, CNN showed five pro-abortion picketers, all that could be found, and ignored the 300,000 pro-life marchers. CNN's Rick Sanchez wondered out loud which group dominated. Newsweek claimed that most participants were in their 60's when, in fact, most were under 25. This video sets the record straight.

• Category

  News & Politics

[fwuffy1959]

Yet the "Right to lifer's" fight against contraceptive measures to eliminate unwanted pregnacies? and education for youth in this matter; and want to "fund crisis pregnancy centers" 'rather than' planned parenthood? how is that pro-active? Your have this all backwards! and you talk about the value of Life while you wave your guns and fight against gun control! so youre against pregnancy control, (avoiding pregancy by using contraceptives)? but yet are affraid they will take your guns? 

[Steve Sanborn]

Pro-abortion proponents -- you must stop throwing out straw man and non sequitur arguments - they don't cloud the judgement as they once might have. One point only is necessary - Human life begins at conception. No matter the circumstances, the sins, the crimes, the weather, the season, the opinions, the scores of the World Series. Human life begins at conception and some people care about that and some people do not care about that. Some want to protect and preserve, others want to destroy.

[ecvolleyball88]

Thank you, I went to the March this year and was astounded at how badly the media portrayed us. Good job trying to set the record straight. God bless!

[AceyPC]

Watching this now, I lost my love for CNN...! Innocent lives will prevail... God bless you!

[nobleite]

All of the Founding Fathers of our country wanted a strong news media to keep government honest. They would all be puking now to see the Main Stream Media under the iron fist of the leftist political fascists.

[CrazyMikey4Life]

Abortion should be kept safe and legal.  The problem with the anti-choice movement is that they feel that if they close down women's clinics that abortion will go away. It will not. It will cause back alley abortions to occur, which will put the women's life at risk. It is a lose/lose for your movement because abortion will not go away. So you might as well leave it legal. My church is very pro-choice and we actually talk to women that are going through this. Anti-choice people won't.

[Grant Green]

hey im a "pro lifer" if it was up to me i would rather spend tax money on free reversible contraceptive implants, operations and medication for women instead of abortion. And your trying to win an argument by throwing a whole bunch of different sets of arguments in the pool that's not related. I support gun registration and i do not support the death penalty

[animalabusinglosers7]

Im a guy so can't have a Abortion, never got anyone pregnant-we use b/c or condoms. Im considering a Vasectomy due to Human Population control (look up "Earth Clock" scary stats) We've also considered Adopting since TONS of kids-teens are in Foster Care. We went to "open house" for it but only 5 people showed up-Gay couple, old single + us. Where r religious prolifers-I support if u Adopt!

Also PRO-LIFERS support FACTORY FARM long term suffering/abuses of ~100 mammals/yr MEATVideo dotcom WATCH?

[fwuffy1959]

I believe if you read the bible you will see that 'god breathed' into man and he became a living soul, thats when a human person comes to be..if no breath, no life...(what about still born?) and the laws in exodus were about the mother, not the fetus? straw man? the propaganda and militant right wing agenda is so. but thanks for your opinion. and woman has a right to her body and her reproductive decisions. Hitler took many of those rights away.

[johnclawed]

Notice how the press photographs the pro-abortion group of 5 people at an up-angle to hide their low numbers.

[TheCrazyInsomniac14]

Right... Time to projectile vomit at the stupidity of the pro-life movement.

[Donovan Phillips]

No, she was unhealthy. I'm saying that her case should not be used as an argument for why abortion should be legal in every case. If both mother and child will die, then fine, save the woman. But if a woman just wants an abortion for the sake of not having a child, then that is wrong.

[khbkb]

" Abortion should not be used as a means of birth control."

Fair Enough

Was Savita Halappanavar demanding an abortion because she decided that she didn't want to me a mother?