Atheist Epic Fail ( eproulx ) 03 - Prometheus & Jesus false analogy

PROMETHEUS BOUND
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/27458/27458-h/27458-h.htm

The death of promotheus
http://www.onthisdeity.com/6th-august-1964-the-death-of-prometheus/

Zeus genealogy
http://fairwaylawns.tripod.com/titans_tree.htm

Brothers Grimm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brothers_Grimm

Richard Wurmbrand
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wurmbrand

Prometheus in Greek Arth
http://www.theoi.com/Gallery/T21.3.html
http://www.theoi.com/Gallery/T20.1C.html

All rights for the soundtrack go to:
http://incompetech.com/m/c/royalty-free/index.html?genre=Soundtrack

The Songs used:

Chee Zee Cave
Ghostpocalyps
Evil March
Clenched Teeth

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Zeitgeist
• conspiracy
• christianity
• eproulx
• Prometheus
• prometeu
• prometeus
• false
• analogy
• atheism
• ateism
• ateismo
• ateo
• philosophy
• hypnosis
• science
• angry atheist
• Disproving
• god
• Inception-style
• Disproving god Inception-style
• bible
• Prometheus & Jesus
• ateos
• militant atheist
• Ro

[TheSelfishAltruist]

oh god what a waste of a persons time...

[VyckRo]

@TheSelfishAltruist

For militant atheists, all information are . . waste of a persons time.

[Mayhamsdead]

@VyckRo "all information IS* a* waste of (a person's*) time." ...You said a mouthful.

[AtheistToothFairy]

The larger point is this.

People have always been known to invent gods and the bible god is just another one of the bunch we made up.

If you doubt this, then cough up some objective evidence for this bible god and MAYBE we'll listen to you

[blkstang69911]

What of today's view on the old testament? Specifically Deuteronomy Chapter 22 verses 20 - 22: "But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then they shall bring out the damsel on the door of her fathers house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you."

This practice has clearly fallen out.

[SnitchSeeker]

@ZZzzzzzWhat Actuall Spinoza's idea of a God is what my idea of a God is.I'm not defending the Catholic church and the Inquisition, but religion did do good things,like build orphanages and hospital.I don't think the Pope can represent me or God.My religion is very personal.It's about me and my deity,not anyone else.

[ZZzzzzzWhat]

... therefore the torture and book burning, but that's all ok because they were only humans.

It's not that simple. If you are a catholic, the Pope represents you. He is human but his decisions are according on what your religion represents.

Oh and btw, i strongly suggest you to learn more about the Renaissance period, about Spinoza's concept of god, about the Famiglia de' Medici (their scientific patronage) and about 'Index Librorum Prohibitorum'.

[ZZzzzzzWhat]

@SnitchSeeker Sure, sure, the church "sponsor a lot of scientific discoveries" why don't you point out one of those? And no, Neither Coppernicus nor Gallileo were sponsored by the catholic church.

So the Pope was a totalitarian oppressive lieder just to "power to gain trust"? are you serious? do you also justify the inquisition and the book censorship(Index Librorum Prohibitorum)? Oh right, the Pope sponsored science the problem was that science gave him the answers he didn't like(...)

[SnitchSeeker]

@ZZzzzzzWhat The church really did sponsore a lot of scientific discoveries during the Renessance.And the church is run by humans and humans make mistakes.The Pope was not only a religious leader at the time,he was a political one.Any leader that senses the people don't trust them anymore would everything in their power to gain that trust.I don't see a problem with God,I see a problem with the Church and humans.

[ZZzzzzzWhat]

The church did not sponsor these scientists, they either were from rich families like Coppernicus or they were sponsored the the "mecenas" which were rich families(like the Famiglia de' Medici) who payed for art and scientific research. Da Vinci was sponsored by theses 'mecenas'. The church only sponsored artists to make their churchs artwor. when it came to science and literature the catholic church did a lot much harm than it helped, search for 'Index Librorum Prohibitorum' if u care to learn.