Lecture Series on Physics - I: Oscillations and Waves by Prof.S.Bharadwaj,Department of Physics and Meteorology, IIT Kharagpur. For more details on NPTEL visit http://nptel.iitm.ac.in.
@ocularix...The inverse mapping theorem allows ANY change of coordinates, as long as the Jacobian of the transformation is not zero in the neighborhood of a required point. The change of coordinates being made is into so-called `canonical` coordinates. These new coordinates are special in that they reduce the pde to a simpler form.
Strictly speaking, he did not show that the Jacobian of the transformation (x,t)->(w1,w2) is different than zero in the neighborhood of a point of interest.
Beginning around 15:30 the good professor uses the second partial derivatives of x and t as equivalent to the quantities squared, without any explanation of why this would be valid? To me this casts a long shadow of doubt on this solution method!
maaan...how dry
DarthVader4553 3 months ago in playlist Partial Differential Equations
@JPFlaneur theoretical physics ftw :)
deyomash 3 months ago
Very good and all but this is not Physics I
JPFlaneur 4 months ago
Nicely pitched and explained. Good to find.
universalsailor 7 months ago
cheap
yodaboy267 8 months ago
HORRIBLE TONE AT THE BEGINING - ESPECIALLY IF YOUR WEARING HEADPHONES!!!!!!!!!! Can you edit it out?
gchapman1211 9 months ago
@ocularix...The inverse mapping theorem allows ANY change of coordinates, as long as the Jacobian of the transformation is not zero in the neighborhood of a required point. The change of coordinates being made is into so-called `canonical` coordinates. These new coordinates are special in that they reduce the pde to a simpler form.
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
Strictly speaking, he did not show that the Jacobian of the transformation (x,t)->(w1,w2) is different than zero in the neighborhood of a point of interest.
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
Beginning around 15:30 the good professor uses the second partial derivatives of x and t as equivalent to the quantities squared, without any explanation of why this would be valid? To me this casts a long shadow of doubt on this solution method!
ocularix 1 year ago
thanks
00calvera 2 years ago