roger federer vs rafael nadal 2005 miami finale

roger federer vs rafael nadal 2005 miami finale

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• 2005
• miami
• finale
• roger
• federer
• vs
• rafael
• nadal
• 11

[rockerduff1231]

Hrbaty beat federer more times than lost to him, so does that make Hrbaty better? I think not.

[20036012]

Nadal is 9-2 on clay, on hardcourt is 3-3 tie and on grass Federer leads 2-1 so Nadal only dominates on clay....

[guitarfreak223]

@Victoyi3n What boasting and cockiness?

[Victoyi3n]

i swear..theres sumthin with nadal that makes federer weak, maybe nadal acts with boasting & cockyness makes roger feel uncomfortable...all the time man.......fckn cunttt

[apun94]

@AlexSongAhn if u r talking about fed's record on grass, then compare it with nadal's record on clay as these are the best surfaces of both players... in which nadal has done better, even if u forget the no. of 1000 events nadal has won clay. fed is 30 and has 6 wimbys, nadal is 25 and has won 6 french! and nadal's record on grass isnt bad, he has reached the final of wimb since 2006, so the last two years they havent met in wimb is becuz fed loses in the earlier rounds, not nadal...

[apun94]

@AlexSongAhn i m talking about the domination of fed AGAINST NADAL... i know that overall he is the best but against nadal, he sucks... u r rite that he is GOAT but i dont think ur last statement is true.

[apun94]

@AlexSongAhn what i meant was that fed doent dominate nadal on any surface... otherwise yes, fed is indeed the greatest player ever...

[AlexSongAhn]

@apun94 and did you say fed doesn't dominate in anything?! you, sir, have lots of tennis to catch up on. you're talking about the world's longest-reigning No. 1 at 237 consecutive weeks, and winner of a record 16 grand slams. nadal himself called federer the "greatest player in history." fed never needed to dominate one surface. he dominated tennis for the last ten years, and he will now dominate the history of the sport for a very long time.

[AlexSongAhn]

@apun94 i'm not sure where you've been the last decade, but federer is a 6-time wimbledon champion (5 of them consecutive, an all-time record) on grass. nadal has won 2, which would be impressive for your average ATP pro, but you can't compare nadal to fed on grass. the record is only 2-1 between the two men because nadal lost to other players before reaching fed in the final.

[apun94]

@Ohcacful ya, so??? fed just has a slender lead of 2-1 on grass, thats not domination...

[Ohcacful]

@apun94

Wait... you're kidding, right? You see, there is a surface called "grass"...

[apun94]

@20036012 yes nadal only dominates on clay but fed doesnt dominate in anything...