Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

MazdaSpeed 3 vs. EvoX Pt.1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,276
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 21, 2009

EvoX getting walked by a Speed 3

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (nikolaspeed3)

  • yea that was funny now run him from a dig so he can laugh 2

  • i dont know how much laughing he will do with a quarter mile of 13.9 and im at 14.2

  • thats cool, look out for corners, that mitsu will splatter your ass

    3gs even 500$ later and it will walk you on a straight too.

    just sayin,

    a turbo neon is fast too, lets keep some perspective

    I am excited for you though, you can do some work from 45 on a straight, on dry pavement, in a mazda,

    When you buy an X, you are pretty much buying a sh*it load of potential. Sadly, your Mazda is at its prime.

  • i think that it would take a little more then $500 for straight line. And if just exhaust and intake is prime... i hope that you are joking. thats not tuned no engine management system, not even getting into building engine and upgrading turbo. and a sh*# load of potential for $40K i would expect a little more.

    Regarding SRT4s they have to have some good work done to keep up with speed3s stock.

Top Comments

  • @ApexIXMR

    You are kidding, right?

    EVOs and STIs when stock are NOT fast from a roll. AWD has the highest parasitic loss out of all the drivetrain configurations, while FWD is the most efficient. Compare the TRAP speed in the 1/4 mile with these two vehicles.

    That EVO is probably dynoing 260AWHP while the Mazda isn't far behind but it weighs less.

    Please educate yourself and then come back.

see all

All Comments (83)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @nikolaspeed3 so true. If you spend the difference between 23k and 40k on the speed3 to match the price of the Evo the Evo would never even come close in speed or handling

  • @sleeksilver I know i was reiterating the commentary in the video, guy

  • ms3's are quick, and just as potent in the curves.

  • @ UbeRationale you just stated the best thing about this video $40k Vs $23K! Props to Mazda for making a potent platforms that can in perfect conditions run with one of the best! Oh ya and remember 3gs or 500$ five the speed drivers 20 or 20500 to work with MORON!

  • @sleeksilver EXACTLY!

  • @ApexIXMR you shouldnt talk if youve never been in a mazdaspeed 3. its a quick car and yes stock vs stock the evo has it beat but you also have to realize that the evo is about 10,000$ more and it takes a turbo back exhaust and an intake, (about $1,000) to make the speed3 faster. and yes of course the evo has more potential in the longer run. if you want to make it a track car. but you cant hate on the mazda just because it 23k brand new and can keep up with your car. HA

  • @freeloaderchriss

    They really aren't that fast from a roll when stock, guy. The X is slower than the IV.

    I pulled on stock Evo 8s with my last vehicle and it was one of the last vehicles on earth that you would ever expect that to happen with.

  • well hey guys here is the deal i have an X with a CBE and intake and i walk my buddys ms3 everytime not even close...ill post a vid soon showing you so i dont just talk on here i actually show proof

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more