Mere Christianity? Preliminary

The exchange with my father continues.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• christian
• apologetics
• atheism
• theism
• religion
• c.s.
• lewis
• mere
• christianity

[feralshrew]

The finger tapping is driving me crazy lol

[WineisyourFriend]

hehe. That noise actually isn't finger tapping. It's something on the table, or perhaps the webcam, teetering whenever I make the table move. It bugs me too. I'll be careful of that next time. :o)

[SolRosenberg84]

The assertion "evidence can be used to understand reality" seems a bit more credible than many of the other assertions to me, as it seems to be self supporting without consciousness intervention, but thats just me.

[Zacharybinx34]

Reading to page 20 means nothing.

Everyone begins with an assertion, everyone.

[SolRosenberg84]

I made it to page twenty of that book. Terrible argumentation. It uses the lovely "begin with an assertion based on half assed observation than argue everything from there."

I was head-desking by page seven.

[bananagraveyard]

As would I. Any chance?

[lodown31]

I would be interested in seeing your thoughts chapter by chapter. I have plans to do some book reviews myself. I think it's a great idea and I would have gotten to them sooner if I wasn't in the middle of moving. Anyways, see also Ravi Zacharias for a very good Biblical and Philosophical defense of Christianity. He's one the best and as a Christian if I could only recommend one Apologist, he would be the one. He has a podcast, "Just Thinking", that has really good Q&A episodes.

[dewonthegrass]

Yea, do a video, chapter by chapter. I'll be very interested in seeing that.

[freedom0f5peech]

I would love to hear the book report.

[jay666KJ]

I also gave him multple DonExodus videos and a AronRa video on what a theory is, and he basically generalized ALL my links and evidence as "atheist and bias, and no bodies" as though science daily is "atheist" or Donexodus is 'atheist" and Ken Miller is "atheist and a no body" I also told him his bullshit of mixing 6 fields into one field is dishonest and total bullshit, and his reply was simply all my sources were bias, and atheist.

Again, pissed me the fuck off.

[jay666KJ]

We are discussing science, and he claims all my science articles and sites are bias. So I am fucked either way, because what else am I suppose to use????? If I don't use real, peer reviewed science to disprove the book, I am fucked because it's "bias" or I don't, and what do I have left? I am fucked either way, I can't possibly win. But if he ever want to debate me on logical grounds. I am up for it, cause he can't possible say "its bias" or anything else.

Just really pissed me off.

[jay666KJ]

Really pissed me the fuck off and I yelled "oh so Ken miller a roman CATHOLIC biologist is an atheist and is bias?" I was pissed off for about two days, until I realized. I am fucked.

I mean, we are talking about science, and all my sources were PEER REVIEWED science arrticles, and most werent even evolution anti creationist sites. Science daily is simply science news, and the college for physicist is simply physicist info. I basically said I am fucked either way.