"Marriage was established to regulate procreation."
ANd yours is a silly argument. a canned one that's easily defeated.
With straight people... "procreation" is not required. A man and woman who want to spend their lives together and join all assets can and do get married. Newt GIngritch or Rush Limbaugh in their many marriages aren't having any more kids...why didn't you conservatives protest those?
Women who enter into a contract whereby they are protected and provided for, have children who are going to do better, and are less likely to be separated from one or both parents.
Men don't give away protection and provision for free (just look at how hard it is to collect child support).
Without marriage, the govt must act as the protector/provider.
@kitmarq Is it 1920 again? Lol.
BillA1016 8 months ago
@kitmarq
"Marriage was established to regulate procreation."
ANd yours is a silly argument. a canned one that's easily defeated.
With straight people... "procreation" is not required. A man and woman who want to spend their lives together and join all assets can and do get married. Newt GIngritch or Rush Limbaugh in their many marriages aren't having any more kids...why didn't you conservatives protest those?
hipstermi 1 year ago
Really?
JJeveryday 1 year ago
What a ridiculously false argument.
Marriage was established to regulate procreation.
Women who enter into a contract whereby they are protected and provided for, have children who are going to do better, and are less likely to be separated from one or both parents.
Men don't give away protection and provision for free (just look at how hard it is to collect child support).
Without marriage, the govt must act as the protector/provider.
Marriage is not about rewarding goodness.
kitmarq 2 years ago
D= *shudder*
snager80 2 years ago
reminiscent of godwin's law
3rdpsalms 2 years ago