Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Hitler & Isis

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,908
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Feb 10, 2008

Reincarnation & Magic.


Brianstalin is a Reiki Master Teacher, who has spent many years in the Far East. Healers who have daily access to the Akashic Records have taught him that accurate past life data retrieval requires simple and focused psychic techniques very similar to dowsing. Subjective psychic impressions tend to be heavily tainted, resulting in distorted and inaccurate data. This is mostly evident in deep trance states experienced by those under hypnosis and those mediums who channel disembodied "enlightened" entities, allowing these entities to inhabit their bodies, temporarily, and to speak through them. Dowsing, contrary to popular belief, is very objective and the information obtained by such means can be very unexpected and intriguing. A number of psychic techniques and investigations can then be used to test the data later. Pendulums are a good start, but sensitive dowsers can rely on increasingly subtle mental, physical and psychic vibrations and sensations. The conclusions reached by ego can never be a good substitute for lots of meditation and healing/energy work.

http://brianstalinsnotebook1.blogspot.com/
http://pastliferegression1.blogspot.com/
http://pendulumpowers.blogspot.com/
http://www.myspace.com/brianstalin

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (GarySe7en)

  • So, when contemplating reincarnation and realizing that we, ourselves, are the reincarnations and offspring of the various 'mythological' Gods of history, Gods that we so conventionally choose to forget, the commandment of 'Though shall have no other Gods before me' takes on a whole new meaning. What separates us from 'God'...is our own eGo(d)...

  • To become a 360 degree mason and have Prince Charles referring to you as an Olympian is not the zenith of power - it is the nadir.

    We can only experience higher consciousness by DESTROYING ego, not by worshiping it!

  • do you know that Ares never existed? And the pictures of him that you have put in this video were made in the 18th century, ny the only imagination of the painters?

    Please, try to be more serious.

  • The Olympian Gods did exist and a number of them are still around today - lost in delusion - I may add.

    Brianstalin tells us that Princess Diana was not only named after the goddess Diana, but was actually her reincarnation.

    Painters work with imagination and intuition which often borders upon direct contact with higher consciousness.

    According to the Akashic Records many paintings of Ares resemble Hitler for a very good reason.

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You say a number of them are still around today. The wording seems to imply that some are no longer around?

    Is that so? If so, what happened to them.

    I'm assuming some have mastered the death/rebirth cycle, (i.e. Jesus, Siddhartha) and have moved on? Is this the basis of 'the second coming' of Jesus we keep hearing about?

  • Princess Diana was, of course, adored and worshiped by millions!

    People don't usually respond this way, especially to royalty.

    We tend to only think that we know what we're talking about because of limitations of the levels of consciousness we have permitted ourselves to work with.

    Brianstain reminds us we all have access to a lot more besides the short sightedness that our egoism presents us with.

  • Princess Diana can never be the reincarnation of the godess. These 2 women had nothing in common (I'm talking of their personalities) I am a fan of them, and I've read a lot, so I know what I'm talking about.

  • "Catherine the great wasn't the second wife of Peter the great of Russia: she was the wife of Peter's grandson!!!!!

    One more proof that this is just a huge crap!"

    Our History books tell us that Catherine I (1684 1727) and Catherine the Great or Catherine II (1729-1796) were different people.

    Those blessed with the gift of sight are very often the most blind.

    More proof that we are conditioned to be biased and completely indifferent to exploring the truth in any objective manner?

  • Catherine the great wasn't the second wife of Peter the great of Russia: she was the wife of Peter's grandson!!!!!

    One more proof that this is just a huge crap!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more