Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Benz v Bimmer: 2008 Mercedes C63 AMG vs. 2008 BMW M3 Sedan

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
317,496
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 15, 2008

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=125350

There will be no Camaro vs. Mustang death match this week due to a distinct lack of Camaro, so can we interest you instead in a muscle-car comparison test? Here we have two classic nameplates, each with a 400-horsepower V8 stuffed into a smallish four-door body shell and powering only the rear wheels.

Naturally we're referring to those two paragons of modern muscle, the 2008 BMW M3 Sedan and the 2008 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG.

Don't be confused by the German nameplates, the aura of high-tech engineering and the rarefied price tags. The 2008 BMW M3 Sedan and 2008 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG match up as naturally as any muscle cars on Woodward Avenue during the 1960s.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 28 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • BMW

    

  • coupe . . m3

    sedan . . . c63

see all

All Comments (790)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Both great cars, can't say both look great tho. But like always, I will stick with a vehicle that gives me the control, the feel of being in charge, the 1 that will never disappoint me,... The 1 with the Manual Transmission obviously =)

    Can't be driving a car with a million HP and have it in pussy ass Automatic, the hell is wrong with the people now days?

    LOL if you can't drive a Manual, you are a worthless POS!

  • Id take the merc, better road car (more tech, faster, louder, comfortable etc) but the bmw is a brilliant track car no doubt. Its just I have no access to a race track so the bmw is useless to me.

  • C63>M3

  • @jiggles26 i prefer the C63 AMG Black Series Coupe then the m3

  • Merc

  • 2012 C63 has 482 Hp, and much more newer/better things on it and in it... That C63 has no rival at all...

  • BOTH

  • To me, this slight difference in 0-60 times dont matter. BMW handles better and has better control over its power and thats why i like it more. its not just about the drag. Drive both the cars up a hill and see the merc lag behind. Ofcourse the mercedes sounds better, looks more evil but well..its a merc and it cant beat a bmw.

  • @cacamonster91st Honestly the 0-60 time on the c63 means nothing to me lol. I just know its fast as hell and it can throw u back when u step on it. I'm hoping I'll have mine by Monday or Tuesday. If I get it I'll post a video on it.

  • @LiuetenantDan93 lol its all good, i know the M3 does it 4.4 so i figured the C63 would be more like 4.3 since its slightly faster, i know the manufacturers put out around the same numbers but the C63 is put down as .1 tenths faster, so when i saw 4.1 for the merc i knew that was wrong cause no M3 does 4.1 or near that, but some reviewers get ridiculous numbers somehow u know, just know ur shit and when u come across this like me u'll know they're wrong, not saying u dont know but im just sayin

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more