Can anyone say "Cookie-Cutter"? Look, the best way seems to be a resource based economy with the intelligent application of modern technology. We now know that there's enough to go around. Its time to create a society in which we design out scarcity, bigotry, most or all neuroses, and any other technical problems using the intelligent application of technology. The fractional reserve banking system which governs Earth, is mathematically defective; that is, poor pockets of society are built in.
...as a scapegoat to brush away anything that would force him to question his dogma.
And depends what you mean by equality. If you mean in the economic sense, then yes, I indeed hate such equality,because a brain surgeon is not and should not be economically equal to a janitor.Who died and said that all people by default should be economically equal?Since when such equality became the most noble thing in the universe,that it justifies taking away people wealth at the point of a gun?
...towards the state and politicians. It's too bad that economically illiterate fools like don't, and think the state has some sort of magic powers to make people prosperous only on their say so. Your "Right-Winged media" is nothing more than an imaginary scapegoat that you can use merely to make it easy for you to dismiss anyone who doesn't buy into your statetheist dogma, so you don't have to question it, just as the typical religionist drone uses "Satan"...
...the point of gun? If you answer is yes, than congratulations, you might actually be a free marketeer without knowing it, so now you know it. If your answer is no, then you are just an anti-social economically illiterate authoritarian statist who thinks other people owe him something by the virtue of his existence.
And I don't give to hoots about any "Right-Winged media", I just apply the same skepticism I apply towards religion...
Just because socialism claims to be "ALL FOR the citizen", doesn't actually mean it's "ALL FOR the citizen", and history consistently shows that the only ones who benefited when socialism was implemented by the state were the ruling elites who commandeered the socialist state, NEVER the average citizen. And if someone can own his own business without the state in your ideal socialist society, would he also be free from the state to leave him alone and not take his wealth at...
@Akatam0t0ma You poor deluted bastard. If you were to.... RESEARCH Socialism, you'd under stand that it is ALL FOR the citizen. You can work any branch you'd want and if you choose, you can own your own business without the state. One thing I don't get is that you're smart enough to know that religion is false, but dumb enough to believe the lies the Right-Winged media tells you? You must hate equality.
"Dem darn dirty left-winged, brown skinned muslims n' homosexuals!"
"I have no clue what FOX News is telling you other than Glenn Beck chanting..."
You should thank the non-existent gods for Fox News&Glenn Beck, whom you can use as scapegoats to dismiss anything that does not conform to your obsolete statist dogma, because otherwise, you would have been forced to question your own faith in the state, which is something you are obviously unwilling to do.
"Buy it or else" isn't how Socialism works. You live off the state and make it your bitch, that land should be owned by the state as it should be. No one ever said everything is 'free' in a socialist system. You shouldn't be able to use that land without State clearance. I have no clue what FOX News is telling you other than Glenn Beck chanting "NAZI NAZI MARXIST OBAMA SOCIALIST"
What if someone has more cows that could eat the free grass? What if someone had a bit of bad luck and could really use the land? Also, what if the land could produce more food through veg farming?
If the people as a whole owned the land, they could decide the most efficent way it could be used to support society, or better, the government could give ownership to the person who could use the land to benefit society most.
You think that anyone who wants it can have it as long as they're first.
What if someone has more cows that could eat the free grass? What if someone had a bit of bad luck and could really use the land? Also, what if the land could produce more food through farming?
If the people as a whole owned the land, they could decide the most efficent way it could be used to support society, or better, the government could give ownership to the person who could use the land to benefit society most.
You think that anyone who wants it can have it as long as they're first.
Can anyone say "Cookie-Cutter"? Look, the best way seems to be a resource based economy with the intelligent application of modern technology. We now know that there's enough to go around. Its time to create a society in which we design out scarcity, bigotry, most or all neuroses, and any other technical problems using the intelligent application of technology. The fractional reserve banking system which governs Earth, is mathematically defective; that is, poor pockets of society are built in.
OnePieceWonPeace 1 year ago
@Sheepytown:
...as a scapegoat to brush away anything that would force him to question his dogma.
And depends what you mean by equality. If you mean in the economic sense, then yes, I indeed hate such equality,because a brain surgeon is not and should not be economically equal to a janitor.Who died and said that all people by default should be economically equal?Since when such equality became the most noble thing in the universe,that it justifies taking away people wealth at the point of a gun?
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
@Sheepytown:
...towards the state and politicians. It's too bad that economically illiterate fools like don't, and think the state has some sort of magic powers to make people prosperous only on their say so. Your "Right-Winged media" is nothing more than an imaginary scapegoat that you can use merely to make it easy for you to dismiss anyone who doesn't buy into your statetheist dogma, so you don't have to question it, just as the typical religionist drone uses "Satan"...
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
@Sheepytown:
...the point of gun? If you answer is yes, than congratulations, you might actually be a free marketeer without knowing it, so now you know it. If your answer is no, then you are just an anti-social economically illiterate authoritarian statist who thinks other people owe him something by the virtue of his existence.
And I don't give to hoots about any "Right-Winged media", I just apply the same skepticism I apply towards religion...
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
@Sheepytown:
Just because socialism claims to be "ALL FOR the citizen", doesn't actually mean it's "ALL FOR the citizen", and history consistently shows that the only ones who benefited when socialism was implemented by the state were the ruling elites who commandeered the socialist state, NEVER the average citizen. And if someone can own his own business without the state in your ideal socialist society, would he also be free from the state to leave him alone and not take his wealth at...
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
@Akatam0t0ma You poor deluted bastard. If you were to.... RESEARCH Socialism, you'd under stand that it is ALL FOR the citizen. You can work any branch you'd want and if you choose, you can own your own business without the state. One thing I don't get is that you're smart enough to know that religion is false, but dumb enough to believe the lies the Right-Winged media tells you? You must hate equality.
"Dem darn dirty left-winged, brown skinned muslims n' homosexuals!"
Sheepytown 1 year ago
@Sheepytown:
"You live off the state and make it your bitch"
No, actually the state makes YOU its bitch.
"I have no clue what FOX News is telling you other than Glenn Beck chanting..."
You should thank the non-existent gods for Fox News&Glenn Beck, whom you can use as scapegoats to dismiss anything that does not conform to your obsolete statist dogma, because otherwise, you would have been forced to question your own faith in the state, which is something you are obviously unwilling to do.
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
"Buy it or else" isn't how Socialism works. You live off the state and make it your bitch, that land should be owned by the state as it should be. No one ever said everything is 'free' in a socialist system. You shouldn't be able to use that land without State clearance. I have no clue what FOX News is telling you other than Glenn Beck chanting "NAZI NAZI MARXIST OBAMA SOCIALIST"
It's like the man has Tourettes Syndrome.
Sheepytown 1 year ago
What if someone has more cows that could eat the free grass? What if someone had a bit of bad luck and could really use the land? Also, what if the land could produce more food through veg farming?
If the people as a whole owned the land, they could decide the most efficent way it could be used to support society, or better, the government could give ownership to the person who could use the land to benefit society most.
You think that anyone who wants it can have it as long as they're first.
cjoe94 1 year ago
What if someone has more cows that could eat the free grass? What if someone had a bit of bad luck and could really use the land? Also, what if the land could produce more food through farming?
If the people as a whole owned the land, they could decide the most efficent way it could be used to support society, or better, the government could give ownership to the person who could use the land to benefit society most.
You think that anyone who wants it can have it as long as they're first.
cjoe94 1 year ago