Ocean Energy Launch (Part-1)
Uploader Comments (007bmac)
Top Comments
-
Damn Reagan and those Republicans.
-
socialism is way worse...
there may be no money lust but there's a freakshow of power lust, and thats not only ugly but very dangerous-
best we just get on with our lives and get things done, we don't need people to force us to work hard we do it because we are worth something...
carter was the best thing to ever happen to america
All Comments (52)
-
@442hoeky war is the normal path,plenty of pseudo volunteers,War was fun but i think now we are scare of it , we need to focus with the same commitment and effort to something else that will benifite us all, we don't need to rid of humans, we need 1 trillion humans, this planet was potential for that.combine in a structure our needs and nature needs, i call that paradise. and yes is possible we have already sense it many times.
-
OTEC is perfect not to provide energy but was a mean to produce WATER , is the cold end or the siphon of energy, all work comes from energy diference, now use otec energy to pump cold water to the top of an updraft tower and get the water from condensation of the vapor in the air flux of the updraft. i´m that clever??
-
@lcabosa Well, you touched on the best solution, of course - war (not that it's a GOOD solution!). The biggest problem with this planet is there are too many people and we continue to multiply like bacteria. I'm not saying war is a good thing, but if you want to save the planet, best to get rid of most of the humans! Only problem there is finding volunteers... not it!
-
@442hoeky why do u give so importance to them?? i`m figuring out a way, but is a massive change , not for our generation, the problem is our urbanization, energy source and recycling materials,i´m drawing a city that delivers solutions for that, so use your brain and think something different and new that maybe one day can inspire others to change, if not War will..., heheh.
-
@lcabosa I guess I just refuse to change the system by going broke myself and leveraging the cost of the rest on following generations. If governments want to clean up the planet, then good, I'm all for it. So figure out a way to do it that doesn't cripple the west while China and India continue to pollute as they please, filling Walmart with their junk. Also, figure out a way to do it that doesn't involve me going to the poor house. Finally, lose the scare tactic propaganda.
-
@442hoeky so don't mix things, there's a global weather change problem, and there's a campaigner program from someone to get dividends from it. we need a major solution, we are facing now problems that begun sense first urbanization start to appear on the surface of the globe. Not some devices or even infinite energy can solve it, we need to change.
-
@lcabosa I said in my post we need new forms of clean energy - but it has to cost effective. The Global warming hoax was designed largely by people looking to get rich off of expensive alternate forms of energy and the band wagon was jumped on by environmentalists who want less pollution but know nobody cares about pollution unless there's a physical scare attached to it. Remember acid rain? The rain forests being cut down by McDonald's? The hole in the o-zone?
-
@442hoeky a hoax?? ahaha can u fell yourself ?, is easy to see the climate is changing.and about energy, we need infinite energy...
-
Here it is just over 4 years after this video was made and global warming has turned out to be a hoax. Cheap, clean energy is still something we need to research - but it needs to be CHEAP as well as clean.
-
@ycats1000 fuck you
When was this video made?
pirejknf 3 years ago
1980-81 was the production date. The project worked but was discontinued by the then Reagan administration.
007bmac 3 years ago 2