Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust ( english subtitles )

Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center. He is interviewed on danish TV2 News. People can see a full transcript, news, forum and the video ...  
 
Customize

More From: Enderlein79

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
2,681 ratings
Sign in to rate
326,620 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (5,969)   Options

Loading...
TheBoHoBoy (3 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
If a plane did slam into the pentagon, why are the lamposts, signs, etc still standing? I meant the ones that were inline with the planes trajectory? An d why is the hole in the side f the pentagon so small to have ben made by a plane so big ?/ just my thoughts
qualityrkc (7 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@palasta does the view count on this video ever go up?
palasta (15 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So you're able to differentiate after all...
J1NX1337 (19 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
pubs . usgs . gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/therma l.r09 . html
katey1dog (20 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Irrelevant concerning that we've only seen a 5 second blur that didn't resemble an airliner...

But I'm not concerned with the Pentagon. i don't mind if you want to believe a helicopter crashed into the pentagon.

:::facepalm:::
KevinMerck (21 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Neither FEMA nor NIST performed any tests for explosives!

Any sane person will not have a problem understanding that you can't rule out explosives if you never even tested for them.

Over 100 first reponders reported flashes and explosions!

Independent investigators had no trouble finding *all kinds* of evidence for explosives and lots of it too.

Check out A&E for 9/11 Truth to get the facts.
palasta (22 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Oh, it certainly is relevant.

Hey, i don't mind if you want to believe a helicopter crashed into the pentagon. It's what the reporter says, so you're suppose to believe that it is the truth and nothing but the truth.
palasta (23 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Hundreds of men and women testifying before teh 9/11 commission of hearing explosions are not credible?"

That there were explosions heard isn't the problem. The problem is to verify it were bombs that caused those exploions.

Ever seen "WTC Body Bombs"?

watch?v=wY6D_F_izTo

So, according to KevinMerck (we control noise levels) those could easily pass as "explosive devices". Besides that there were falling Elevators, the jet fuel, falling debris, smoke gas, of course the planes and more.
palasta (23 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Groundhog Day?

Have you forgotten what you were told? Are you unable to follow? Seems like.

AS IF, LIKE, they described how it looked like from there view... AS IF it detonated... it was LIKE it detonated. For the third time, when a massive force of 50-100 mio. J is pushing downwards it certainly does literally detonates away everything in its path and it's not going to be silent. And the charges are not to be set off during collapse, they are ignited before the building is about to move.
katey1dog (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Ever seen the newscast where it was assumed that a helicopter crashed into the pentagon?

Pardon? That's irrelevant.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.