A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust ( english subtitles )

Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center.

He is interviewed on danish TV2 News.

People can see a full transcript, news, forum and the video in high quality here:
http://agenda911.dk/article.php?story...

Another site in danish is encouraging people to stand forward demanding a new investigation here:
http://www.i11time.dk/

The full report from the scientists can be found here:
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/con...

• Category

  Science & Technology

[colonelclankable]

Is it any wonder that all of the steel and debris from the World Trade Centers were sent overseas for melting ( steel ) and destruction ( concrete )? Wouldn't want any evidence left around for analysis now would we...

[blattmacher]

Many steel buildings have been on fire before, some for days. None of them ever came down. Until Sept.11th 2001. That day a physical miracle happened. Not once, not twice, but three times.

The existance of molten steel pouring out of the buildings, extreme heat until December, the evidence of nano-thermites and a couple of other miracles like FBI/CIA & NORAD "out of order", advance warnings etc. leads to only one conclusion.

ONLY COMPLETE IDIOTS CAN STILL BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL VERSION.

[PoetryZound]

BTW, I had to change my account name to post here because the owner of this video can't stand hearing opinions that don't agree with his own. So he censored by PoetryWound account. What a positive display of character!

[PoetryZound]

Yes, the truthers switched to thermite when they couldn't find evidence of 130 db detonation charges going off just before collapse and they couldn't find any trace of detonation charges in the seismic record. The problem with the thermite (now nanothermite) theory is that even Niels Harrit says the energy density of the alleged nanothermite chips was insufficient to melt structural steel columns and so, according to Harrit, lots of conventional explosives had to be used as well. LOL!

[blattmacher]

According to your logic, are Niels Harris and several other profiled academics idiots or children?

[buddyfreakinhoIIy]

Nope, you still got it wrong. He was not awarded $6 billion.

And nope, he never said the buildings were pulled. First of all, he was referring to just 1 building, not buildings (plural). Second, his exact words were "They made that decision to pull." Who is "they?"

I'm not paid anything. Are you really so dimwitted that you think anyone who disagrees with your misinformation is paid?

[buddyfreakinhoIIy]

"There is no other way to explain away free-fall speed other than controlled demolition."

You simply made that up. How come the world's physicists and structural engineers don't agree with you? Do you even know what you're comparing it to? Do demolished buildings fall at free fall? Do you even know?

BTW, the free fall was measured at the roofline of the north facade, which fell last. The whole building didn't collapse at freefall, just one portion of it. Overall, WTC 7 fell in about 18 secs.

[redcapedjoker]

Larry Sileverstain got awarded 6 billion dollars from the building's destruction. He said that the buildings were 'pulled' in a PBS interview when he was asked about it. WHERE AM I WRONG?

What money do you pays for bills for posting disinformation on the subject? You are being fed off the blood money.

[redcapedjoker]

There is no other way to explain away free-fall speed other than controlled demolition. I mean building 7 had 49 inner steel columns 1 foot thick. The 46 floor building collapsed in mere 7 seconds (watched the footage with a stop watch). This means all the inner supporting columns had to have been removed (cut with charges). There is NO way to debunk this. Simulations were run of the pancake theory of collapse (one floor falling on top of another in a chain, etc.) this takes 30 seconds+!

[tkm2210]

You can actually see the explosions if you watch the towers in slow motion. Blowing debris sideways great distances. From what I understand you need to destroy the base columns to bring a huge building down. Which is what the bombs were used for. It's been proven by repeatable experiments that the "pancake theory" is completely impossible. So I at least know we are being lied to.

[buddyfreakinhoIIy]

Explosions are not uncommon in fires. There were no bombs or explosives found and there was no trace of any in the seismic record.

Thermite was CLAIMED by Harrit/Jones et al, but they refuse to share their dust samples with anyone for corroboration. James Millette did his own study with other WTC dust & found the material was primer paint, not thermite.

The beams forming the cross were "melted" together? Wrong.

Which structural engineers or physicists say near free-fall means CD? None.

[buddyfreakinhoIIy]

Boy, you sure got a lot wrong in 1 post!

Silverstein walked away with $6 billion? Wrong.

He insured the towers 6 months prior? Wrong.

$2 trillion in gold went missing? Wrong.

Hijackers are still alive Wrong.

Apparently, you rely solely on some unaccountable, piece-of-shit clownspiracy basement blog or video for your "information."