Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

VP Richard Cheney: fed 9/11 trials "big mistake"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
554 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 24, 2009

Former Vice President Richard Cheney spoke with Scott Hennen about AG Eric Holder's decision to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al in federal court, in New York City, for the 9/11 attacks and war crime of mass-murdering 2,976 men, women, and children. Visit 911familiesforamerica.org for more on this travesty.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (NotWitty2)

  • This audio is just plainly false. This is not the "first time in our nation's history an enemy combatant caught on the battlefield will be tried in civilian court"

    That distinction belongs to John Walker Lindh who was caught in Afghanistan and tried in federal court. U.S. v. Lindh, 227 F.Supp.2d 565

    So the idea that 9-11 changed things was ignored by the Bush administration.

  • John Walker Lindh was exempt from being tried as a war criminal due to President Bush's November 13, 2001 Executive Order. Look it up,

see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Johnny Lin Walker was tried in a civilian this is correct.The difference with KSM is he is not an American citizen,he is an enemy combatant, the blood of thousands of Americans on his hands.(many more if he had his way)The 5th and 6th amendments to the Constution applies to American citizens( miranda rights,against self incrimination, as well as trial by jury,speedy trial) trying the shoe bomber and Massoui in civilian court was also wrong, Padilla, like Walker, was an american citizen

  • iRAQ WAR= Big Mistake

  • Seems to me that Cheney and his gang are dead set against these trials because they're afraid of what the prisoners are going to reveal to us.

  • Wow, I didn't know that. I still stick with what I said. Despite how Bush classified the man, he was fighting the U.S.A in armed combat and was captured on the battlefield. He swore an oath to Taliban and was trained by Al Qaeda. That to me is an enemy combatant.

    What do you think about the broader point though that Lindh, Mauossoui and Padilla were all similar tried in federal court under Bush and no one batted an eye.

  • Let's not forget that 9/11 did change some things. This is a good explanation.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more