Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Super STOL C-130 Mishap

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
377,163
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 20, 2006

I have seen this video several places, many don't tell the story behind it, and many seem to have it wrong.

Operation Credible Sport, also known as Operation Honey Badger, was a United States military operation plan in late 1980 to rescue the hostages held in Iran using C-130 cargo planes modified with rocket engines. The Credible Sport operation was to follow the dramatic failure of Operation Eagle Claw in which a C-130 Hercules and a Sea Stallion helicopter collided in the Iranian desert, killing 8 servicemen. Credible Sport was abandoned after the election of Ronald Reagan as President in November, 1980.

The Credible Sport plan called for highly modified C-130 Hercules cargo planes to land in a soccer stadium not far from the American Embassy in Tehran and airlift the hostages out. Three aircraft were modified under a top secret project at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida to YMC-130H configuration with rocket packages blistered onto the forward and aft fuselage, which theoretically enabled the planes to land and take off within the confines of the sports arena.

During a demonstration at Duke Field, Eglin Auxiliary Field 3, on October 29, 1980, one of the modified Hercules fired its braking rockets a few seconds early (this seems to be wrong, see note below). The aircraft suffered an extremely heavy landing, tearing off the starboard wing, setting off a fire, and resulting in the airframe, serial 74-1683, being written off. Despite this, the entire crew survived.

This failure, coupled with the defeat of Jimmy Carter by Ronald Reagan in the presidential election on November 4, 1980, led to the cancellation of this rescue mission plan. The hostages were subsequently released concurrent with Reagan's inauguration in January 1981.

The other two airframes, serials 74-1686 and 74-2065, were stripped of their rocket modifications and returned to regular airlift duties. In 1988 74-1686 was placed on display at the Robins Air Force Base museum, Georgia. As of 2005, 74-2065 is assigned to the 317th Airlift Group, 15th Expeditionary Mobility Task Force, at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas.

Note
One of the test pilots during the Credible Sport program elaborated on the test failure, the test with the footage now available. The pilot states that during the test the braking rockets did NOT fire prematurely, but right on time. It was the descent-arresting rockets, rockets that were supposed to fire after the braking rockets to slow the drop of the aircraft as the aircraft's forward velocity was halted and the wings ceased to provide lift that failed to fire. Looking at the video, it would appear that the braking rockets should be fired after the aircraft touched down to quickly stop the landing roll. However, the braking rockets were supposed to be fired while in the air, then the descent arresting rockets would fire to allow a controllable and almost vertical landing. It was these rockets that failed, with the crash landing and aircraft breakup resulting..

Note; the naration seems to be wrong on a major point in the video.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Credible_Sport

http://crediblesport.com/

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ATFSCrash)

  • Hey did any of the pilots die in this? I can't find anything about it.

  • @Rcracer867

    If you can't find anything on this, you certainly didn't look very hard. There are links in the video description. ;)

  • So, barring the one crash I have to ask, did it ever actually work?

  • Yes and no. IIRC It at least partly worked in the tests. However after the mishap flight; I think the plug was pulled on the project. I don't think it was ever used in operations.

    However a relative of this project is still in service. The RATO (rocket assisted takeoff) versions are still in service.

    IIRC The reverse thrust braking rocket and cushioning rocket concept was abandon after this failure.

see all

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Just as North Korea exploited Carter s and Clintons weakness and naivety to get the nuclear bomb. The peaceniks have made the world a much more dangerous and hostile place. I find it ironic that political activists nominate Clinton and Carter for Nobel peace prizes; when in fact their contributions to North Korea and other such compromises have made the world a much more dangerous and violent place. Like Reagan said; trust but verify, and Ill add, carry a big stick.

  • Reynard13Fuchs: Youre not being honest, the biggest reasons that the Iranians made a 12th hour deal is that Reagan barked, and Reagan had a history of backing his bark with actions. The Iranians made a 12th hour deal to try to avoid serious consequences for taking hostages. Instead they brokered a deal with Carter that essentially rewarded the Iranians for taking the hostages. Carters weakness and incompetence and willing to compromise was exploited by the terrorists.

  • @flyfish3434:

    "all Reagan had to do was bark"

    Uhh, more like recite the Oath of Office, in other words, Reagan did NOTHING.

    Look up the Algiers Accords, because THAT is what released the hostages.

  • The History channel does the best they can with the info they are given.

  • InzuDraRagna: It looks like the altitude may have been too high; but definitely the rockets that were meant to cushion the landing (downward facing rockets did not fire at all). Ive heard both claims that that was the crews error or a malfunction that prevented those rockets from firing. At this time Im not sure which.

  • InzuDraRagna: the History Channel is awesome; however theyre not always correct. You ought to take a closer look at the video and do a little a little better research. Im not entirely sure what the facts are because there are many conflicting claims. It seems the narration in this video is wrong and that perhaps the history Channel was somewhat wrong.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more