Pathetique Rondo (sonata no. 8)
Uploader Comments (dhfeld)
Top Comments
-
mate, thats pretty fukin good
-
That a really nice piano, wish I had one like it.
All Comments (73)
-
O_O toka genial mis respertos (Y)
-
great!!great perfomance and you feel what you playing,really awesome and beautiful,right tempo
-
8 people deserve a slow and painful death for disliking Mr. Feldman's playing.
-
sweet piano but your rooms doesnt have much space left :P
-
This is pathetique!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA
-
fabulous!
-
AMAZING. Great speed, accuracy, expression everything. Amazing work! What grade / level are you at?
-
Far too fast. Allegro quavers!
You then have to slow down the triplet semiquavers for technical reasons and the lyrical episodes for musical reasons. This tends to support my view that your opening tempo is too fast. At 0:58; your dynamics are reversed! Technique and memory are good on the whole.
I have a few questions:
What brand of piano? Maybe is it a Steinway & sons? (if it is, is it really that great of a piano to have)
How many years have you been playing?
sukinorules 7 months ago
@sukinorules .... the piano is made by Grotrian, which is a German company. This performance was recorded four years ago, after roughly five and a half years of piano training.
dhfeld 7 months ago
素晴らしいです:)
TP225 4 years ago
おつかれさま (at least I think this is right!)
dhfeld 4 years ago
I have to say of all the recordings of tis movement on youtube (of which there are few), you are the only one who plays it at what i call the 'right tempo' and with confidence.
Having said that, there are a few things I'd like to point out other than the obvious technical errors Sorry if you've corrected or whatever Im not too sure about the slow second episode.. you suddenly slow down randomly.although i like wat u do with ur LH, bringing out the melody at the end of every phrase in that episod
trixy54 4 years ago
Thanks. The obvious errors (and a few that are less obvious) all got corrected. You're also right that the second part of the rondo was a little slow relative to the first part. That got corrected as well.
dhfeld 4 years ago