Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

2005 Mustang GT vs 2006 Dodge Daytona

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,678
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 26, 2007

2005 Mustang GT Auto (300 HP)- JLT II CAI, 4.10 Gears and UD Pulleys
vs
2006 Dodge Daytona Auto (350 HP)- CAI

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (2k05gt)

  • Part of the reason, aside from weight, that the Charger is kind of a slow steamer is the way Chrysler has tried to make it so hard to modify anything. Now that the Diablo's been out for awhile it should be lots easier to make a more lively vehicle out of it. I may seem biased, being a Charger owner, but I like the new model Mustangs alot. Cross-brand hating is really kinda ignorant. - Nice vid by the way.

  • Good Post. boredpapertigers Cross-brand hating is really kinda ignorant, I am looking to purchase the 2009 Camaro next year. and a Challenger. I want all three of these cars in my garage.... Can't wait.

Top Comments

  • chargers are to damn heavy ..a charger r/t 06-08 5.7liter V8 340 hp weighs 4,268 lbs and does 0 to 60 in 6.2 seconds a stock 2005-2008 Ford Mustang GT coupe 4.6 liter V8 300 hp weighs 3,450 lbs and does 0-60 in 5.4 seconds stock for stock a gt can dust a charger r/t anyday in a drag race btw i like the old chargers of 68-72 but these big ass 4 door family cars from 06-08 are an injustice to the charger name.. i'm glad i bought a 2006stang gt instead of a 4 door heavy ass family car

Video Responses

This video is a response to Daytona Charger vs 2005 Mustang GT
see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Actually, mustangs ate electronically governed at 145. Not 130.

  • @MrHookups09 I've had my 06 gt well over 140, actually it was still pulling when i let off the gas

  • We should ALL be happy to see such a wonderful return of muscle again, no matter what manufacturer, as long as well all agree it's to destroy rice!

  • you guys are stupid YES the charger magnum and 300 are all heavy but have you ever drove one i use to be that same hater until i drove one and found out for myself the stock 06 mustang vs stock 06 charger is an even race yes the mustang gets to 06 first but the charger get to 100 faster they (lx platform) dont grab well until about 40-45 then its bye-bye and top end the R/T will leave the mustang that tops out around 130 or so when you can go 142 stock in a charger i have done it in my 05 magnum

  • @k1whiterussian , Technically par for par each generation, The camaro is better.

  • They have the challenger they made the charger for a family car for those guys who are die hard v8 fans, the charger is decent for what it is.

  • mustang is the best!!!

  • yes its his fault that his reation time was good and the charger's was terrible. Yes what a cheater. YOU ARE STUPID

  • yea i agree completely. the charger is just too heavy, I own a 2005 mustang and i its too heavy as well. The 4 door was a mistake that dodge should have never made. It truely is a disgrace compared to the old chargers and does not deserve the same name.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more