Electrogravity & T. T. Brown

Thomas Townsend Brown's 1928 Brown paper on the Biefeld-Brown Effect: An Electrogravitic effect whereby high-voltage electrostatic fields effect local gravity. T.T. Brown was born in 1905 in Zanesville, Ohio. He discovered electrogravity while toying with a Coolidge tube. He later went on to produce an asymmetric capacitor which he termed the "Gravitator", Brown entered CalTech in 1922 and later left after his professors ignored his work on electrogravity. Brown transferred to Denison University where he worked with one of his physics professors Dr. Paul Alfred Biefeld. Myth Busters, Dr. Martin Tajmar, and Dr. R. J. Talley (USAF) have tried to debunk the effect with unconvincing results. In 1955-56 Brown conducted vacuum chamber experiments at, Societe Nationale du Constructions Aeronautiques du Sud-Ouest, a paris based aerospace company.
In the March 9, 1992, issue, aviation week & space technology magazine it was disclosed that the B-2 Advanced Technology Bomber electrostatically charges it's exhaust stream. West Coast Aviation scientists and engineers revealed the information. At an aerospace sciences meeting held in New York in January 1968 Northrops Norair Division revealed it was conducting wind tunnel experiments on electrostatically charging the leading edges of speeding aircraft bodies. Similar research was conducted in 1965 by the Grumman and Avco corporations.
Additional Links and Sources:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3999756060825810913&ei=SPZUSou5O...



1960 electrokinetic apparatus U.S. Patent #2,949,550 (1960-08-16) (T.T. Brown)

http://users.erols.com/iri/TTBROWN2.htm

"Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion" by Dr. Paul LaViolette

http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0211001

http://www.doctorkoontz.com/.../Test_of_Biefeld_Brown_Effect.htm

(No seriously...)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld-Brown_effect
(recently edited at the time of release of this video. Let's see how long it lasts!)

Additional Info:

In the Asymmetrical Capacitors for Propulsion (http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/reports/2004/CR-2004-213312.pdf) tests, in the Observations section it states:
...After several days of tests, we found that no device showed signs of rotation at a pressure less than 300 Torr, with one exception. When Device 2 wired according to Circuit A was placed in the chamber and immediately pumped down to a pressure of 5.5 × 105 Torr, something interesting happened. The voltage on it was increased to 44 kV, and through the viewing port a large arc was observed. At that same moment, the device was seen to move about an eighth of a rotation and stop.
The large arc that was observed suggests that this movement was most likely caused by
material being ejected from the device...


Ejection of material was the team's hypothesis but it was never proven. If the capacitor had been encased in a dielectric resin this would have prevented arcing and the experimenters could have seen if there was movement when the DC voltage was first applied.


In the 21st Century Propulsion Concept (http://foldedspace.com/Twenty%20First%20Century%20Propulsion%20Concepts%20Rober­t%20%20L.%20Talley%20Complete.zip) tests, in the anomalies section, it states:
Near the end of the experimental program, we briefly examined the force generation effects with pulsed fields, which had a peak voltage of 19kV. Test Nos. 56, 59, 62, 68 and 69 were conducted in this manner, using pulse repetition rates of 10, 60, 150, 400 and 600 Hz. Generally, no motion of the test devices was observed, except in Test No. 69 where a very small but detectable motion was seen. For an input voltage of 19 kV during this test, the apparent force was about 0.007 micro newtons (which is just about the force measurement threshold of 0.002 micro newtons) and is not considered significant).


In both the Asymmetrical Capacitors for Propulsion and the 21st Century Propulsion Concept tests movement in vacuum was seen, and only seen, when pulsed DC voltages were applied to the capacitor devices that had a physical solid dielectric material between the capacitor plates, likely Lexan in the first and Acrylic in the second.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Biefeld
• Brown
• Electrogravity
• lifter
• B2
• bomber
• antigravity
• anti
• gravity
• electrogravitic
• tech
• alien
• technology

[aydarsh]

So would there be any other reason about why the lifter doesn't work in a vacuum?

[AlienScientist]

@aydarsh,

Yes, if the effect is ion wind, then it will not work in a vacuum. I still need to perform my own experiments to verify whether or not this is true.

Regardless of the effect being due to ion wind or electrogravitics, it is still useful for propulsion of craft such as the B-2. 

[skyhigh973]

Y some of ur videos r private?

[AlienScientist]

Some of them I have pulled because they are no longer relevant, of have been replaced. I still keep them up so the record of comments is saved for future reference.

[Peralisc]

i believe free energy is created when you would use antigravity . that's all i am going to say

[AlienScientist]

The vibration of a Bose condensate at the dimensional frequency of 1.094 megahertz-meters appears to increase the strength of the phonons that bind the condensate. This increased strength invites nuclear participation. Superconductors and proton conductors can be externally vibrated to harness the effect (Podkletnov et. al.) The Long range nuclear effects may be used for the production of Free Energy. while the strong graviational effects may be used for propulsion.

[AnEliteSpartan]

in this video you sound like a tv commentator for the history channel or the science channel.

[Individualism101]

Yeah I agree. If you google: Jean-Louis Naudin lifter, this guy (I call him the french guy) has done some high quality experiments regarding lifters. Instead of using a vacuum chamber, he used prebuild vacuum tubes for one side of the asymmetric capacitor. And under these conditions the experiment worked -- which basically disproves the ion wind theory outright.

I can't help but wonder if some of NASA's secret space-planes use this phenomena, and perhaps that is why it is being covered up?

[withholeyshoes1]

@josephvelder ... in the vid description, ""Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion" by Dr. Paul LaViolette"

[darkferiousity]

I really find your videos interresting but ive been doing some studying on t.t borwn and when I watched the episode of mythbusters it looks like they really did not show much work on his experiments what I mean is they concluded it is ionic wind but when tt brown did his experiments he put them in some sort of oil to rid of any ionic wind now correct me if i am wrong its just what i understand from it and im a little confused

[josephvelder]

you read this straight out of Paul A. Laviolette's book "Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion" without giving him any credit.

not cool.

[shardsofsteel]

@AlienScientist Thank you for your comment on it working regardless (as used in the B-2) we have far to many skeptics and not enough people actually trying to make headway and your one of those trying to make headway.

[olga2415]

So much for relying on Wikepedia...on anything; including the data it publishes on galactic cosmic radiation in and past the van allen belts.

[SirVaughnElric]

I want to see Mythbusters test the Rodin Coil :p DO IT

[exnol]

ROFL on all the "science" and comments....