Collapse of WTC building 7: were explosives used?

This video focus is on the collapse of WTC building 7, a less widely publicized event that remains unexplained to this day. Even the official government investigations admit they can not explain why this building collapsed. Perhaps it is because the official government theory is not allowed to consider the impact of explosives in bringing down WTC 7. If explosives were used to bring down WTC 7, that would strengthen the case that WTC 1 and WTC 2 were also brought down, at least in part, by explosives.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• 9/11
• ConfrontingTheEvidence
• reopen911.org

[12weasel100]

(continued)

14- Anybody who believes... Uh you have no fucking idea what anyone believes you cannot read peoples minds that is merely your OPINION

Every single fucking line and clip in this entire video...........PURE SHIT

freetruth101...........is a fucking idiot.

[12weasel100]

(continued)

12- WTC7 also collapsed in a manner that can be explained by explosions- uh no that is merely your OPINION at no time did you present a single fact to support that bullshit OPINION

13- This is why the govt says they do not know how it collapsed- uh no we DO KNOW why it collapsed however to offer state this is why they state....is only an OPINION

OPINIONS are not FACT

(continued)

[12weasel100]

10- pieces of a building cannot fall through concrete and steel as fast as through air- so WTF is your point??? Debris falling outside of the tower clearly hits the ground first proving that the tower did fall slower falling through concrete and steel and did not fall at free fall

11- fact that towers fell in less than 10secs is proof- uh no that is a bullshit lie not tower fell in less than 10 seconds.

(continued)

[12weasel100]

(continued)

7- the building falls at free fall with dust at the bottom. No tower fell at free fall. And you really think that a collapsing building would not produce dust???

8- 1:20 "Building 7" your pic shows debris over a large area. Your own pic is proof WTC7 did not fall into it own footprint

9- Some of what we have is speculation. Uh no ALL of what you have is opinion and speculation. NONE of it is fact. Speculation proves NOTHING only FACTS do

(continued)

[12weasel100]

(continued)

5- Nobody asked any questions- WTC?? Yeah because you stated firefighters already explained what happened

6- The collapse of WTC7 is not identical to a controlled demo. It may have similarities however it was not the same. A horse and zebra have similarities also so would you now also call horses and zebras the same

(continued)

[12weasel100]

(continue)

3- your own "proof" is only preliminary after by your own words a few months. After a full study however they know exactly what caused the collapse

4- Silverstien never said firefighters demolished the buildings. The term pull it has been explained. Besides this point is illogical why go on TV and openly admit his crime and why would insurance pay out if it was fraud

(continued)

[12weasel100]

It is amazing how much bullshit you fit into 2 mins:

1-WTC was not hit by an airplane- yeah so what is your fucking point??? It was hit by WTC1 or how would you explain the damage and fires

2- 0:19-0:24- edited footage of the collapse. Try showing the entire collapse not just the end with the outter wall that fits into your shitty belief

3- After months of investigation no idea of collapse- yeah if you read your own pic it says "prelimenary study". (continued)

[12weasel100]

Freetruth101 you are a fucking moron. Your video is complete shit.

Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.

[PoetryHound]

The firefightes said WTC 7 was unstable and likely to collapse.

[BigT27295]

@cottoniiijoe: yea i can see clearly where a big ass building fell on top of it dumb ass.