Collapse of WTC building 7: were explosives used?

This video focus is on the collapse of WTC building 7, a less widely publicized event that remains unexplained to this day. Even the official government investigations admit they can not explain why this building collapsed. Perhaps it is because the official government theory is not allowed to consider the impact of explosives in bringing down WTC 7. If explosives were used to bring down WTC 7, that would strengthen the case that WTC 1 and WTC 2 were also brought down, at least in part, by explosives.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• 9/11
• ConfrontingTheEvidence
• reopen911.org

[BigT27295]

@cottoniiijoe: yea i can see clearly where a big ass building fell on top of it dumb ass.

[cottoniiijoe]

it collapsed not because a plane hit it, but because a fucking another building fell on top of it,

building 7 was leaning like the tower of pisa, thats why the fireman got the fuck out of there,

whats with the bullshit vid stating " they did not know what brought the building down" are fucking serious, as for explosives, watch a vid with "AUDIO" of building brought down by cd,

half of fucking ny would have heard the explosions, no audio proof yet, as for concrete used in the wtc's? wtf,

[buddyfreakinhoIIy]

God, this video is such self-evident horseshit. How can anyone fall for it? You have to be uneducated and a frothing government hater to even begin to believe this conspiracy silliness.

No, I'm not in denial. I'm in fits of laughter.

[kaderbpstpmuzik]

great mystery...

[Rich711]

Whoever made this video is hilarious. Statements like "It is scientific fact and can not disagree with it" that is the most preposterous statement since 99.9% of all scientist agree that global warming is man made. He uses words like science and fact but then makes these dogmatic statements like "You can not disagree" and there only one explanation and if you disagree it must be because you are in denial. What an idiot.

[terrymanning1]

Shit video thoroughly debunked bullshit

[Skeptic121]

The collapse of WTC7 was BETTER than most controlled demolitions. The east and west upper corners of the north facade dropped within a half second of each other, though the building was 100 meters wide. Pretty good timing for chaotic fires but easy for a CD. WTC7, at least the part we can see in the videos, dropped at free fall ACCELERATION (not speed) for 2.25 seconds, according to NIST. Therefore, some "event" suddenly removed 25 meters of vertical support from all over the base.

[Appleholic1]

So let me get this straight....when the leaseholder of an office building orders the fire department to blow up a building they have to do it? Is that what we are supposed to believe now? I never knew " lease holders " had that much power.

[TimothyRaymond1]

Are you suggesting that the fire department and Larry Silverstein were "in on it?" I think they would both find that extremely offensive. What Larry Silverstein said was "pull it." That phrase is not used in the demolition industry to refer to destroying a building with explosives. What he meant was that the fire department decided to "pull" all the firefighters out of the building.

[TimothyRaymond1]

All the accounts of “explosions” come from eyewitness testimonies from a few people who were very panicked, scared, and confused at the time. If there were explosions intended to demolish the building, there would have been very loud bangs heard from miles around and clearly recorded on all cameras present. Look at videos of buildings being demolished with explosives, and you'll see just how much noise they make. Building 7 had no sounds of explosions at all.