The alarmists even admit that AGW is not falsifiable meaning that it is not even a valid scientific theory. Catastrophic GW is an extraordinary claim that is lacking the accompanying extraordinary evidence that rational scientists require i.e. not scientists who are receiving big UN funding to help push their collectivist agenda. Don't forget that the UN was founded by people like the Rockefellars who often write about their desire to abolish nations and have central planning.
Right wingers are such disingenuous wankers. Global warming is NOT a religion. It has 100 years of science behind it. And ALL the worlds top scientific institutions agree! It is falsifiable by giving PEER REVIEWED evidence for what is causing the warming of not CO2 or show that long wave radiation photons are not absorbed by CO2. Oh and the real nail in the coffin for this wankler's anti science stance is the fact that Christianity is a religion therefore that is wrong I take it? Hmmm...
wow, Krauthammer certainly hammered the point home. Global warming is a religion, otherwise we would see some evidence that contradicts the theory. Rather all that we see is vague statements without fact. Glad to see the truth is getting out on this scam.
@cano21 You obviously know more than every climatologist on earth, please share with us the information you have access to that they do not. To make the case that global warming is a hoax, someone would have to believe that environmentalists and political liberals control businesses and industries worldwide as well as the legislative bodies and scientific institutions of every developed nation in the world. That would be a hard case to make.
@detoth67 97% of climatologists? LOL!! You can't seriously believe that number that was fed to you by the enviro-nutters? 97% - that's too funny! It's more like 70%-30% (and the 30% of "deniers" aren't receiving gov't money to research the harms of GW - follw the money)
@superduperjew You wouldn't know research if it sat on you face little girl. Talk about the ice core data debocle - you alarmists never did clear up that little snafu.
The alarmists even admit that AGW is not falsifiable meaning that it is not even a valid scientific theory. Catastrophic GW is an extraordinary claim that is lacking the accompanying extraordinary evidence that rational scientists require i.e. not scientists who are receiving big UN funding to help push their collectivist agenda. Don't forget that the UN was founded by people like the Rockefellars who often write about their desire to abolish nations and have central planning.
ComicPenius 3 weeks ago
Praise Gaia! Science Blasphemers!
MrApplewine 1 month ago
wake up sheeples, global warming is so corporations can profit off your ignorance. there was no holocaust, moon landing, 9/11....everything is fake
sausagesnail 4 months ago
Watching Krauthammer school those mental midgets on Inside Washington is one of life's simple pleasures.
DankWin 1 year ago 2
Right wingers are such disingenuous wankers. Global warming is NOT a religion. It has 100 years of science behind it. And ALL the worlds top scientific institutions agree! It is falsifiable by giving PEER REVIEWED evidence for what is causing the warming of not CO2 or show that long wave radiation photons are not absorbed by CO2. Oh and the real nail in the coffin for this wankler's anti science stance is the fact that Christianity is a religion therefore that is wrong I take it? Hmmm...
StunnedByStupidity 1 year ago
wow, Krauthammer certainly hammered the point home. Global warming is a religion, otherwise we would see some evidence that contradicts the theory. Rather all that we see is vague statements without fact. Glad to see the truth is getting out on this scam.
Dodger481 1 year ago
@cano21 You obviously know more than every climatologist on earth, please share with us the information you have access to that they do not. To make the case that global warming is a hoax, someone would have to believe that environmentalists and political liberals control businesses and industries worldwide as well as the legislative bodies and scientific institutions of every developed nation in the world. That would be a hard case to make.
superduperjew 1 year ago
@cano21 Little girl? Nice one, please just educate yourself further on the subject.
superduperjew 1 year ago
@detoth67 97% of climatologists? LOL!! You can't seriously believe that number that was fed to you by the enviro-nutters? 97% - that's too funny! It's more like 70%-30% (and the 30% of "deniers" aren't receiving gov't money to research the harms of GW - follw the money)
cano21 1 year ago
@superduperjew You wouldn't know research if it sat on you face little girl. Talk about the ice core data debocle - you alarmists never did clear up that little snafu.
cano21 1 year ago