The Astrophotography of Ken James Part 2
Loading...
1,941
Loading...
Uploader Comments (BallaratDragon)
see all
All Comments (18)
-
good images....they are a bit noisy but good
-
very inspirational
-
Whats the name of the music in this video?
-
Thanks aimher. For the images in the videos Part 1 and 2 I used an ED80 and a modified Phillips Toucam webcam. In Part 3 I used the ED80 and a Canon 350d DSLR. In all my imaging I also use another attached telescope and another Toucam webcam for Autoguiding the mount.
Loading...
You're right, you have improved :)
Yup, I'm not gonna be able to un-see the M42 love heart.
Great globular cluster and planetary shots! Also, very nice horsehead nebula. What program do you use for processing?
wafflegirl506 2 years ago
Waffle, I capture using ImagesPlus and process in PhotoShop CS.
But in between these two programs I stack the frames in Registax 3. I believe Registax 3 to be far superior to Registax 4. Not many people use Registax for stacking Deep Sky images as it is designed for Planetary work.
I hope that helps : )
BallaratDragon 2 years ago
Does Registax 3 work better than Deep Sky Stacker? & have you tried Registax 5?
Thanks :)
wafflegirl506 2 years ago
I believe Registax 3 is better than DSS. But that is my personal opinion. Registax gives a smoother finish which reduces noise.
No I haven't tried Regi 5 yet. According to many Planetary Astrophotographers it isn't much different to Regi 4. Just more features, not better stacking.
BallaratDragon 2 years ago
@BallaratDragon
Oh nvm its at the video credits lol. Nice pictures btw
haynakaw999 2 years ago
Yep, it's at the end : )
Thanks.
BallaratDragon 2 years ago