Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Why people should laugh at Evolutionists

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
20,682
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 14, 2010

ACCORDING TO EVOLUTION, TODAY'S PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES ARE ALL MERELY TRANSITIONAL FORMS, part of an endless chain of life whose links are gradually evolving into more advanced stages. For this reason Darwin regarded the classification "species" as "a mere useless abstraction" and "as one arbitrarily given for the sake of convenience."

MUTATIONS
WHAT ABOUT THE EXTENSIVE RADIATION EXPERIMENTS THAT HAVE PRODUCED ACTUAL MUTATIONS AND CHANGES in creatures such as the fruit fly? Isn't this ample evidence to prove that similar mutations could be the "chief building blocks of evolutionary change," as Sir Julian Huxley has called them, and as most scientists and educators today claim them to be?

NO! NONE OF THE MANY THOU SANDS OF SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS WITH MUTATIONS HAVE EVER PRODUCED A NEW "KIND" OR SPECIE OF ANIMAL OR PLANT--NEVER! All of the geneticists and evolutionists, with all of their knowledge and intellect, under "perfect" laboratory conditions, and using their modern radiation techniques that speed up the occurrence of mutations a million-fold--they have utterly failed to change or mutate one "kind" into another! Yet these same evolutionists somehow expect us to believe that blind, unguided chance has produced the millions of beautiful, varying and complex forms of life on the earth today!

And as far as mutational changes being the "chief building blocks" of evolution, Hermann J. Muller, who won the 1946 Nobel prize for his contributions to the science of genetics, said, "IN MORE THAN 99 PERCENT OF CASES THE MUTATION OF A GENE PRODUCES SOME KIND OF HARMFUL EFFECT, SOME DISTURBANCE OF FUNCTION. ... Most mutations are bad; in fact, good ones are so rare that we may consider them ALL as BAD." To illustrate the effect of gene mutations on an organism, H. Kalmus stated in his book, Genetics, "A popular comparison would be with a watch; if a part of the mechanism is altered by some change, it is very unlikely that the watch will be improved by the accident."

A CLEAR-CUT EXAMPLE OF THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF GENE MUTATIONS OCCURRED IN HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI, JAPAN, AT THE END OF WORLD WAR II. The members of the populace that escaped immediate death from the hellish atomic bombs used against these cities were subjected to varying degrees of atomic radiation--resulting in thousands of mutations. None of these mutations produced any new, superior, advanced forms of human beings, as evolution might lead us to expect. Instead, the pitiful victims of these gene mutations suffered deformities, damage and death!

THE FOSSIL RECORD
IF THIS BIG, RIDICULOUS, IDIOTIC LIE, THIS COMPLICATED, FABRICATED FRAMEWORK OF FICTION CALLED EVOLUTION WERE TRUE, THEN THERE SHOULD BE MORE MISSING LINKS DUG UP THAN ANYTHING ELSE! If there were billions of years of evolution, we'd be up to our ears in missing links!

Even Darwin realised this, and so said, "As by this theory innumerable transitional forms ("links") must have existed, WHY DO WE NOT FIND THEM EMBEDDED IN COUNTLESS NUMBERS IN THE CRUST OF THE EARTH? ... The number of intermediate and transitional links between all living and extinct species must have been inconceivably great. He then answered his own question about these missing links by declaring: "I believe the answer lies in the (geological) record being incomparably less perfect than is generally supposed."

BUT NOW, 120 YEARS LATER, DARWIN'S EXCUSE IS TOTALLY RIDICULOUS! Literally hundreds of millions of fossils have been extracted from all fossil-bearing rock strata and none of them are "transitional forms" or missing links--they all obviously belong to a definite species! In fact, it is estimated that over 100,000 different, distinct species of fossils have been found! Yes, no "links"!

  • likes, 2,201 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (purpose2life)

  • Well, evolution makes sence to me. Something you can't say about the creationism. Althought i believe in the evolution, i still think there must be SOMETHING, not a god or allah or anything. Just something that started all this. But we are so small if you compare us with the universe that i really don't think we should say how it is because we simply can't know it.

  • @justf4you "He has created the heavens and the earth with Truth. Far is He above having the

    partners that they ascribe to him. He has created mankind from a sperm drop; and behold this (same) man becomes an open disputer! And the cattle, He has created them for you; in them is warmth (warm clothing) and numerous benefits, and of them you eat."

    [The Qur'aan 16:3-5]

  • It's been proposed that we can never understand the universe, because we just don't have the brain power. Kind of like how a goldfish isn't aware of all the different bodies of water that it could potentially live in despite them being relatively close. I doubt there is a magician in the sky or that evolution is absolutely correct, but at least science is revised.

  • @ismdism " Behold! In the creation of the Heavens and the Earth; In the alternation of the night and day; In the sailing of the ships through the Oceans for the profit of mankind; In therain which God sends down from the skies, and the life that He therewith to an earth that is dead; ..

  • @ismdism In the beasts of all kinds that He scatters through the Earth; In the change of thewinds, and the clouds which they trail like their slaves between the sky and the earth - Indeed these are signs for a people that are wise." "It is He who has made the sun a shining glory and the moon a light of beauty and has measured out their stages, that you might know the number of years and their reckoning.Allaah did not create this but in Truth.He explains His signs (proofs) in detail ...

Top Comments

  • @purpose2life Really think about this for a second. Hundreds of thousands of scientists from different countries and ethnic backgrounds agree on this 'lie'? Yet there is not a single shred of evidence that such a conspiracy actually exists. Religious groups claim that the evidence for evolution doesn't add up because it doesn't match what is written in their book. Where will you draw the line? Has the world been created in 6 days and is it less than 6000 year old? The sun revolves around earth?

  • how old is this video

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Please understand that which you try and debunk.. Either that or stop failing up mah tubes.

  • @purpose2life cuz you know, comets, asteroids, miteorites etc. are helpful and render valuable sevices.

  • @mattmar826 From the movement of the galaxies to the complexities of the interaction of molecules, from the dynamics of eco-systems to the intricacies of DNA, all lead to the obvious fact of the existence of the great Wisdom, Knowledge and Power that allows our Universe to exist and function.

    To any perceptive person the existence and intricacy of creation is conclusive proof of the Existence, Knowledge and Wisdom of the One who creates, organises and sustains it.

  • @mattmar826 To the archaeologist the existence and intricacy of the piece of pottery is conclusive proof of the existence, intelligence and ability of the people who made it.

    Look around you : at the beautiful sunset on a summer evening, at the moon and the stars on a cloudless night, at the water that you drink, at the trees and how they grow from tiny seeds. Think about yourself : your eyes with which you see, your ears with which you hear, your tongues with which you taste and talk etc

  • @mattmar826 Did this archaeologist ever see the civilisation that produced this pot ?

    How does he know that it ever existed ?

    He knows because he saw that the piece of clay was produced by someone who designed it, and shaped it, and had the intelligence to be able to heat it and produce the pot, and not only that, they also had the ability to colour it and make it look beautiful.

    Design ==> Designer.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more