Icom Ic 756 PRO III

Prova in rx, senza alcuna pretesa, dell'icom 756 pro III

Category:

Science & Technology

[alexcanadair]

bellissimo apparato, ti dico anche io un consiglio saggio

trattalo bene ^_^

73

[aleric1312]

Ti ringrazio, ne ho provati diversi prima di del PROIII, MARK V incluso. Non penso ti cambiare radio tanto presto......;-)

73

[AudiophileTubes]

@sophiegromit

Of course they are artifacts. I get the same crap on my brand new Pro3 (on CW), and Icom denies it!!!! This radio feels cheaply made, and the lousy sound on CW is reason (if I had only known) this radio is a ripoff and has design flaws. Incidentally, MANY veteran Hams agreed with me, and pointed out the same flaws.  Icom should issue FULL REFUNDS and a RECALL on this rig to ALL who bought it, and are dissatisfied!

[lckyl16]

Hi. my friend has this rig and just the other day the transmit on ssb went dead. the cw function works just fine. anyone have any clues to what may of happened ?

[sophiegromit]

What's the deal with the 'snaps, crackles, and pops' on CW recieve? Are these artifacts? Are they 'normal' for a DSP rig? Thanks.

[Amishman35]

I'm guessing the signal gets better because you programmed it with a noise profile containing a recording of the frequency with no one transmitting, then when somebody keys up, it just takes the FFT difference.

[ermiggiu]

che bello trattalo bene :-)

[sonick808]

I WANT ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[tuonoblu27]

grande

bello e potente

[mistery60]

Grande ricetrasmettitore!!!