Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

From Reading to Writing the Genetic Code

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,671
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 13, 2009

Lecture by geneticist and A.D. White Professor-at-Large J. Craig Venter

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • It must be averred that his creation of the synthetic chromsome and other courses of action taken to make it possible beforehand is not only the quintessence of ingenuity, but also a great and undeniable boon to humankind if harnessed for its betterment. The religiose may reprimand him for 'playing God', which is absurd, but I found his response to this fairly amusing - 'We're not playing'

  • People must stop being hypocrites and grow up.

    Religion has done nothing but harm to humanity while science, the scientific method and people like Craig Venter have tripled human lifespan since the days of jeebus, have created vaccines that saves millions every year, developed the modern agriculture methods without which we, city dwellers, would all starve to death etc.

    It's absurd and immoral to use religion and myths to try to stop the development of knowledge that will benefit humanity.

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Piquarian Dem sum big wurds.... But I still tink Gawd did it

  • @HWCWTD Now that is a very good point. Bioweapons are definitely on the table for rogue states and other entities that don't mind collateral damage. Since the science is brand new, just the threat of disease can cause mass panic, especially when coupled with the sensationalist MSM. Remember the H5N1 panic last year?

  • @HWCWTD Roughly speaking? That whole genomes, genes, and naturally occuring variants could not be patented but that engineered genes, products, and techniques could be. The case law is still being decided in some cases, and since I'm not a lawyer I can't speak to details. SciAm has run more than a few editorials on both the law and ethics we're discussing here.

  • @eldadevata Yeah, but i think he's more concerned about this information being let out to the world en mass and openeing up the real possibilty of tailor-made pathogens or biologigal weapons specified for certain individuals, leaving no defense what-so-ever.

  • @NorthForkFisherman What did the courts say exactly?

  • @eldadevata Greedy and crass (and struck down by the courts) to be sure. But does that qualify as evil? Hardly. Now had we waited for the government to get off it's collective asses and sequence the damn thing we might still be waiting. And given "govenment expertise" ended up with a sequence that was more a chimaerical being than what a human actually is. Venter is a businessman as well as scientist. I don't fault him for at least trying, but I do applaud the courts more for their good sense.

  • @NorthForkFisherman This is the person that wanted to patent the human genome to be owned and commercialised by one company.

    Not a very altruistic idea I might add.

    If he and his team would have been successful, the scientific progress would have been delayed by decades.

    And this delay would have had even worse effect on medical research and therapy.

  • thanks for sharing this

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more