HOW DID WORLD TRADE CENTER 7 FALL?

was the collapse of WTC building seven a planned controlled demolition ?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• abc
• nbc
• cnn

[carlsm95]

@Scumbot404 The problem with you mentioning those other buildings is that they were all low-rise, not more than 10 stories, not enough weight for a full collapse. 7WTC was a 50 story building with enough weight to collapse the entire thing should a critical column fail. The inner columns failed first (due to hours of fire with no water to put them out) and overloaded the perimeter columns, causing the entire building to fall as one unit.

[Scumbot404]

U can theorize as much as u want but WTC 7 did not get enough damages for THAT kind of collapsing. It maybe got damages enough to collapse partially but still it collapsed like demolited. Oklahoma bombing, the hotel fire, WTC 4,5 and 6, WW2 etc show how a building acts when it gets heavily damaged. Part of them never collapse. Many demolition companies show how a building comes down when it's demolited. Now we got 3 collapsings that r identical with cd. Even clear comparisons exist but u deny it

[Alaskaslim]

@MrManny7426

Collateral damage. The Towers spread debris over 800 yds, destroying 6 other buildings.

Typically, you want demolitions to be just a little more controlled than that.

[Alaskaslim]

@artur4467

"U are american fanatic"

No, I had family at the Pentagon, thus I know, far better than you, what happened that day.

Want proof? I can give it to you, otherwise, go talk to someone else.

[artur4467]

@Alaskaslim can i say something for u ? U are american fanatic like all the american. love the america woooah !!!! but u need to know that we dont want to know if u work in aviation. it doesnt matter.terrorist did not did it. its american plan to attack middle east and take all petrolian. your country is a lie and loser. usa is falling cause usa is paying all the bad things that he did with all world. starting with hiroshima and fat man atomic bomb. think bout it :)

[MrManny7426]

Why use explosions on demolishing when we can use fires lol hahahaha

[Alaskaslim]

@ashdeano

If this yet another claim about the New American Century Document, don't bother.

/watch?v=XebFE_7N-Dk

That argument is old, and long since proven wrong.

[Alaskaslim]

@ashdeano

"I never said anything about a missile system at the Pentagon."

I never said you did, I'm saying that's a frequent use example by people woh don't know any better.

Any talk of NORAD, isn't anymore knowledgable, people seem to just be clueless as to how they operate, and make grand generalizations, at their expense to justify their arguments.

That's all the truth movement is, appeals to common perception, not facts, not intellect, not history, not experience.

[ashdeano]

@Alaskaslim I never said anything about a missile system at the Pentagon.

You're right I have no case, guess I'm not taking the United States Government to court...

I'm reading the 1997 QDR from Cheney & Pals. I'm at the part where they talk about needing to fight and win 2 large, and multiple smaller theater wars in the Middle East to maintain American domniance as the global superpower. It's riveting. I'll get back to ya'.

[Alaskaslim]

"I feel your intelligence"

No, it's called life experience.

I work in aviation, I know along with most of my industry, what went wrong on 9/11.

I know terrorists could do this, I know what are vulnerabilities are. Thus, I have to laugh at convoluted theories requiring bleeding edge technology, over the far simpler answer that's fits far better, and doesn't require anything "hidden", or 1,000s of people, most of whom DON"T work for the Government, to lie.

That is not reason, that is paranoia.