William Lane Craig, True Colors

William Lane Craig has indeed shown his true colors.

He was given ample opportunity to act in a clear form.

I sent him 5 emails
I left him a voicemail
I even contacted the moderator on his forum, filling him in on the issue concerning allowing drcraigvideos to open claim on William Lane Craigs forum that he was legally acting as his agent in this copyright issue.

The moderators reaction was to ban me within about an hour, and to delete every mention of the DMCA from the Reasonable Faith 'Open Forum'

For a man who parades himself as being both an academic and a scholar, such activity is pathetic.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• william
• lane
• craig
• true
• colors
• false
• dmca
• perjury
• academic
• scholar
• my
• ass
• cheap
• censor
• for
• christ
• jesus
• religion
• kalam
• youtube
• strike
• drcraigvideos
• dr
• two
• citations

[Hornadayfan]

William Lane Craig is a doctor in the same way as Dr. Seuss...

[ArchRascal]

"Reasonable Faith"...so reasonable, in fact, that we go to any lengths necessary to avoid or censor all dissenting viewpoints!

[johnrainrules]

@whiteliketar "Joshua was speaking from his perspective"

I love how reality is a matter of perspective to creationists. If the Sun stops in the sky from his perspective either the Sun goes around the Earth, or the Earth stopped spinning killing everyone on the planet.

But then you can't be a creationist if you are not also a moron.

[whiteliketar]

@johnrainrules - are you trying to be stupid or does it come naturally? - Joshua was speaking from his perspective . - this is what happens when dumb atheists use texts out of context - you end up with a pre-text ....for propaganda. whose fault is it that you don't understand or read the Bible .then again atheism and disinformation are like poop and toilet paper...made for each other. lol

[johnrainrules]

@whiteliketar No it didn't take long for me to prove I know more about your silly flat Earth myths than you do.

But then you can't be an honest person and a creationist.

[johnrainrules]

@whiteliketar" btw whose fault is it that you don't read or understand the Bible and understand how sin tainted our lives and creation."

BTW whose fault is it that you don't read the Bible and understand how it claims the Earth is flat Matthew 4:8, Revelation 1:7. Or that the Sun goes around the Earth Joshua 10:12.

But then Creationism has been incompatible with religion since Christians murdered Hypatia. Just look at the Dark Ages.

[whiteliketar]

@johnrainrules ha ha - didn't take long for the hooligan in you to come out did it? lol

[whiteliketar]

@johnrainrules many of the great scientists were believers in God - even Gallilleo - so don't scream atheist dogma without knowing what you are talking about . btw whose fault is it that you don't read or understand the Bible and understand how sin tainted our lives and creation. keep up the atheist babble - just don't drown yourself in it. lol

[cupwithhandles]

Haha - the unbeliever knows his Koran (Bible) best.

- Omar Khayyam

[cupwithhandles]

@NeroJoe83 Yes, NeroJoe83 - Bravo, you're absolutely correct. Craig is not defending the existence of generic gods (my coffee cup is incontrovertibly a true god if I worship it). Craig maintains the existence of a specific god, the Yhwh/Jesus/trinity god as imagined in his interpretation of the Hebrew & Christian scriptures. Atheists who agree to debate the existence of a vague, conceptual first-cause god with Craig are suckers, that is why Craig cleverly avoids the real debate.

[gurudeclan]

Tf just ignore this fool

[gurudeclan]

Tf