Q&A with Laura Knight-Jadczyk -- Psychopaths
Uploader Comments (cassiopaeaorg)
Top Comments
-
thanks so much for the effort put into the videos, sharing this would be an honor! :D
-
thank you
soldier of love
All Comments (41)
-
@MKSPLLMN Well it is important, to all who WANT to know. so if you want to learn something get off your backside and do it. no free lunch here There is plenty of information out there from laura about psychopaths, ie: sott and cassiopaea websites
-
Well Steve should talk to James Randi who is offering a million dollars to anyone who can prove the supernatural. My point however was not that they don't exist, but that they are anomalies that can be explained with science, and that our perception of what they truly are is skewed. Anyways our reality is based entirely on our perception, so one can create fully unique "angel" or "spirit" experiences in their own mind without any anomaly in the environment.
-
@NeutralExistence , spirts and demons are very real. Best you consult steve quayle.
-
Who needs psychopaths, when you have psychiatrists? (Or vice versa...) LOL.
-
"Who needs aliens when you have psychopaths?" Classical line.
-
No that is not unscientific at all, I am proposing a theory to explain what you call "spirits", that is what science does, I do not assume I know what they are, I am simply making a theory based on my observations. That is what science is about, and James Randi has done a good job at proving all "spirits" so far to be simple scientifically explainable factors like I have said. I don't reject that you could be right, but it is highly unlikely. Superstitions? Hardly.
-
I never once said morality is "religious woo woo", however the idea of spirits as a creature depicted in many films, and religious superstition is simply a myth. It can be explained easily with science, and no morality has no place in science, science does not consider good/bad, just what is true, and what is not. My God is 4 forces of nature, and 12 particles of matter that make up the universe.
Ah insulting me, isn't that un-Christian?
-
"...by all reasonable theory's these "spirits" could be..." (see how unscientific that statement is?); "...something in the "spirit world" is not in our field of conscious clearly..." again, conjecture based on the fact that YOU don't or can't perceive it. Yet you say, "~OUR field of conscious" (ungrammatically, btw). I'd send u 2 school or therapy, except it would b a waste of resources & time n ur case. Stop pushing ur superstitions on people, u seem like a brainwashed, psychotic, idiot troll.
-
@NeutralExistence Morality's "religious woo woo"? "We"; "our"? Speak 4 urself. By definition, spirits rn't merely physical phenomena. So, science is ur religion (naturally). U believe morality & science are mutually exclusive, lol. That explains a lot regarding the evils wrought by ur ~god, science. Ur mind can't integrate polar opposites, so always chooses 1 side or the other (extremism). That's why u don't believe science is compatible w/ morality. Ur tragically stuck on stupid (it's genetic).
-
I don't believe we are programed machines in the least, we all have conscious free thought, however something in the "spirit world" is not in our field of conscious clearly. So therefor you cant apply your morals to such a thing. Especially since by all reasonable theory's these "spirits" could be electromagnetic impulses, microwave radiation, or multidimensional beings. It can all be explained with science, no need for religious woo woo.
I dont understand why we only get part of the interview if its so important that people know about this.
MKSPLLMN 5 months ago
@MKSPLLMN You'll be getting the whole thing in parts, and then the whole thing as the whole thing. Patience.
cassiopaeaorg 5 months ago
Where is the rest of the interview?
MKSPLLMN 6 months ago
@MKSPLLMN It's being uploaded first as a Q&A session, then the whole interview.
cassiopaeaorg 5 months ago