Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Smack and The Skeptical Mind part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,155
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 22, 2009

Lets address the spirit of what I call "negative skepticism", and put things into grand perspective. Who has authored the true Laws of the Universe, and are we in our feeble and simple limited intellect REALLY qualified to make empirical statements about them? I challenge all people to consider this when making broad judgments on the thinking of their fellow man.

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (EletrikRide)

  • It has been thus from the beginning of analytical thinking. The ones spouting, "I know it all" are blind like everyone else; they fear what they can't see. At least we are fumbling around looking for more than is apparent. Anyone who takes ownership of the abysmal limitations of mankind would never have flown at Kitty Hawk. They want power over you crazy people who would challenge their conventional wisdom, which is what they fear the most. Skeptics who keep spouting LAW are ruled by fear JDB

  • True!

  • It's not up to everyone else to prove your claims wrong. It is YOUR job to prove your claims true. So far, I have yet to see ANY proof that HHO generators improve mileage. ANY PROOF. Ya Got any? The onus of proof is on you that make wild claims and the bigger the claim, the more proof needed. PLEASE, SOMEONEW BRING ON THE FREAKING PROOF ALREADY!!!

  • FALSE FALSE FALSE

    I have brought all the proof.

    I even swayed one of your favorite mentors.

    I own you, fool. I have a slam dunk. Game over.

    watch?v=ON7BHbZ21Dk

  • I watched your videos, did not see any proof. All I saw were wild claims and a shitload of excuses.

    EPIC FAIL!

  • EPIC VICTORY. I OWN YOU

    watch?v=QSRUrBnsV6g&feature=Pl­ayList&p=3906F0575F849BDC&inde­x=0&playnext=1

    watch?v=zFFoe7C4K_g

    watch?v=AGzntFdtMPI&feature=Pl­ayList&p=4A975184B72183CC

    watch?v=d0cz0e-mFyE

    watch?v=ON7BHbZ21Dk&feature=Pl­ayList&p=B855FAABF6048277

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm not sure what exactly is the point of this video but I think you were attempting some sort of cosmological argument. I dislike the use of your word "Who" when discussing the origins of the laws of physics. You claim to remain objective but by saying Who instead of what sounds like you've already made up your mind instead of seeking a naturalistic explanation.

    If this is some argument for your device then it really is simple, submit it to a skeptical peer review.

  • Thanks - as you can see. the naysayers have not slowed me down....

  • Smack you got a good spirit. Dont let negativity lower you viabration. youv done well. Your dry cell looks impressive.

  • You wont have to wait long.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more