Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Daryl Peach Vs Francisco Bustamante "WPC 07" part 6/7

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
17,553
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 10, 2007

Quarter finals World Pool Championships 2007
Daryl Peach Vs Francisco Bustamante

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I've played a lot of pool in my time and I know this situation. For Buster, it's easy to think that he hit the 3. It can feel that way as a player. The replay shows differently. Definitely the 9 first though it was desperately close. I'm an Aussie and I see no reason for anyone here to slag anyone. Grow up.

  • You gotta hand it to these guys, they're pro's and gentlemen... I can just see Strickland in this match breaking his shit already.

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it was nine its obvious because if it would be 3, 9 would not fall, this is for sure

  • Guys, they had to replay the shot one frame at a time to see the difference. Give everyone a break here and move on with your life.

  • This is why there is a referee. As a player, I can understand Bustamante's behavior. You play until the referee calls a foul on you. To him it appeared to be simultaneous contact. Nobody watching initially thought it was a foul. To Peach it probably looked questionable. Why do you think they had to do a frame-by-frame replay? Thanks to instant replay the correct call was made.

  • @ProdigyKimXP Here's a quote from the BCA official rules....

    It's the BCA Pool league referee is in fact the final authority in all matters of judgment. The BCA takes the extra step to actually list out which situations involve matters of judgment. Matters of judgment include situations where it must be determined whether or not:

    •a player's conduct is unsportsmanlike;

    I believe the only reason they did not enforce this is for fear of leaving Manila in body bags.

  • @widebody123 Could you actually get disqualified for that? I mean, it isn't his responsibility to say when he's fouled or not. That's what the reff's for, right? That's just my thoughts but plz let me know. I'm curious now.

  • @ProdigyKimXP Agreed on both. But pretending it was a legal shot when it was an obvious foul (admittedly close) IS cheating. After the 9 dropped you could even see his nervous glance to the ref as if thinking 'let's see if I get away with this'.

    He then continued to disrupt the game disputing the unequivocal video reviewed decision. He should have been disqualified and forfeited for unprofessional conduct.

  • @widebody123 It wasn't deliberate and fouling isn't cheating.

  • @widebody123 how is he a cheat? was hard to tell even on slow motion

  • long live racism and caos

  • An obvious foul. No replay needed to see it.

    Bustamante is a f-ing cheat, that's all.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more