Global Warming, Environmentalism & Cathy Zoi

Stupidity spawned by the envirokook movement.

The background material

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/02/rats_leaving_sinking_ship_doe.html

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/75469

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/03/02/low-flush-toilets-the-san-francisco-treat/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704662604576202212717670514.html

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• anthropogenic
• global
• warming
• climate
• change
• low
• flush
• toilets
• Cathy
• Zoi
• Department
• of
• Energy
• environmentalism
• energy
• efficient
• appliances
• mandates
• Consumer
• Reports
• Barack
• Hussein
• Obama
• Al
• Gore

[RJGula]

This political lecture could be so much the more better if the speaker wasn't constantly insulting Cathy Zoi with such abusive epithets. We all get emotional in discussing political and social issues but there is no reason to get verbally abusive.

[UTubekookdetector]

RJG: I could've said a lot worse, of course my scorn is righteous scorn when one looks at what she wants to do to people. She's a nanny-statist envirokook who wants to regulate your life into oblivion. I don't care for that and neither should you. I also jabbed Bush & the GOP, are you going to critique me for that as well?

[UTubekookdetector]

I should inform everyone that CHECKYOURSOURCES was banned from my channel because he has comment approval up (which is ok) but didn't allow 4 of my rebuttals to appear on his page. He seems to demand equal time on others' vids & channels, but doesn't allow the same on his channel. For that, he was banned.

[RJGula]

@UTubekookdetector No, by no means. I dislike Dubya and I also hate Public Citizen, Fund for the Public Interest and the PIRGs so I do not disagree with you as this dingbat being a nanny statist and envirokook but, to be honest with you, I always felt the Obama Administration was a much better step than his predecessor.

[UTubekookdetector]

MANBEAR: The N. Hem. cooled from 1958-78, yet CO2 levels didn't go down. Even temp readings in the troposphere since 1978 aren't markely up. Most of the warming is confined to the N. Hem & especially the Arctic. Funny how the ecokooks never think other factors (heat loss through the atmosphere, albedo due to less/more cloud cover, natural carbon sequestering) could influence changes in climate.

[UTubekookdetector]

CHECK: Stay on topic moron, I'm not going to tell you again. You have 2 choices on this vid (or you can post on my channel and then I can reply on your channel where you'll let my comment languish in comment-approval purgatory for a week): 1) Agree with my contention that goverment-efficiency mandates for appliances are a complete failure 2) Disagree & defend your belief.

[checkyoursources]

@UTubekookdetector So to clarify that your views (so we know if you think the policies are at fault or the science) are you saying that Anthropogenic global warming is the best explanation for the majority of recent warming since the 1970's or not?

[UTubekookdetector]

CHECK: You seem to be confused, AGW wasn't a topic in this video, but the energy efficient mandates spawned by such a paradigm. Would you like to comment on how those energy-efficient mandates from Washington have fared? If you have a question for me on AGW, find a vid of mine that specifically focuses on it OR post it on my channel. I posted on this kid's channel months ago (he has comment approval) and days later my comments still were NOT visible.

[checkyoursources]

You appear to have confused your dislike of a policy with the science itself, while you clearly dislike the policies that resulted from science why do you dishonestly attack the science itself rather than just admit you hate the policy and come up with a better one. Please indicate or state a more likely explanation than Anthropogenic global warming for the majority of recent warming since the 1970's?

[UTubekookdetector]

ATHENA: These clowns don't care about consequences, they just want to do "something" even if it is counterproductive in the long run. Keep those CFLs away from your son, they are very harmful.